Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon — John Shaqi
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
Alexander was active, and able to endure heat and cold, hunger and
thirst, trial and fatigue, beyond even the stoutest. He was exceeding
swift of foot, but when young would not enter the Olympic games because
he had not kings’ sons to compete with. In an iron body dwelt both an
intellect clear beyond compare, and a heart full of generous impulses.
He was ambitious, but from high motives. His desire to conquer the
world was coupled with the purpose of furthering Greek civilization.
His courage was, both physically and morally, high-pitched. He actually
enjoyed the delirium of battle, and its turmoils raised his intellect
to its highest grade of clearness and activity. His instincts were
keen; his perception remarkable; his judgment all but infallible. As
an organizer of an army, unapproached; as a leader, unapproachable in
rousing the ambition and courage of his men, and in quelling their
fears by his own fearlessness. He kept his agreements faithfully.
He was a remarkable judge of men. He had the rare gift of natural,
convincing oratory, and of making men hang upon his lips as he spoke,
and do deeds of heroism after. He lavished money rather on his friends
than on himself.
While every inch a king, Alexander was friendly with his men; shared
their toils and dangers; never asked an effort he himself did not
make; never ordered a hardship of which he himself did not bear part.
During the herculean pursuit of Darius,--after a march of four hundred
miles in eleven days, on which but sixty of his men could keep beside
him, and every one was all but dying of thirst,--when a helmetful of
water was offered him, he declined to drink, as there was not enough
for all. Such things endear a leader to his men beyond the telling.
But Alexander’s temper, by inheritance quick, grew ungovernable. A
naturally excitable character, coupled with a certain superstitious
tendency, was the very one to suffer from a life which carried him
to such a giddy height, and from successes which reached beyond the
human limit. We condemn, but, looking at him as a captain, may pass
over those dark hours in his life which narrate the murder of Clitus,
the execution of Philotas and Parmenio, and the cruelties to Bessus
and to Batis. Alexander was distinctly subject to human frailties. His
vices were partly inherited, partly the outgrowth of his youth and
wonderful career. He repented quickly and sincerely of his evil deeds.
Until the last few years of his life his habits were very simple. His
adoption then of Persian dress and manners was so largely a political
requirement, that it can be hardly ascribed to personal motives, even
if we fully acknowledge his vanity.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account