Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
But no doubt he was keenly alive to the failure, so
far, of his calculation on the disaffection of the allies.
And now, after the overwhelming victory of Cannæ, he had to weigh
not only the strategic and tactical difficulties, but the still more
serious political ones. If the allies, or a good part of them, could
be induced to join his cause, Rome would fall sooner or later. If not,
he could never take Rome, nor permanently injure the Roman cause. The
chances were, in a military sense, all against his capturing Rome by a
_coup de main_. Rome was over two hundred miles distant, well walled,
and with a large force which could be quietly gathered to protect it.
If he failed, the game was lost. It was far wiser for him to still
try to influence the allies, which he could now do with a record of
wonderful victories such as the world had not yet seen. Hannibal was
not a military gambler. He never risked his all on a bare chance, as
some other soldiers have done. He always reckoned his chances closely.
And every reason prompted him not to risk the loss of his all on the
chances of a brilliant march on the enemy’s capital, which had only
its boldness to commend it, and every military reason as well as the
stanch Roman heart to promise failure as its result; for there was no
obsequious satrap to open its gates and welcome the conquering hero,
as it had been Alexander’s fortune to meet. If Hannibal marched on
Rome, he must be prepared to besiege the city; and he had neither siege
equipment, nor were sieges consonant with his peculiar ability. If the
story be true that Maharbal asked of Hannibal, after Cannæ, that he
might march on Rome with five thousand horse, promising that he should
sup in the Capitol in four days, and that on Hannibal’s declining,
Maharbal exclaimed, “Truly, Hannibal, thou knowest how to win a
victory, but knowest not how to use one!” it may tend to show that
Maharbal possessed indeed the daring recklessness of a true general of
cavalry, but it also proves that Hannibal had the discretion, as he had
shown in abundant measure the enterprise, of the great captain.
Hannibal probably at this time harbored the hope that, after this
fourth and overwhelming defeat of the Romans, the allies would
finally see that their interests lay with him. In fact, Capua, the
Samnites, Lucanians, and many cities of Lower Italy did join his cause,
and the unexplained time which he spent in the vicinity of his late
battle-field was no doubt devoted to political questions, the favorable
solution of which could be better brought about by not for the moment
risking his now unquestioned military supremacy.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account