Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
To say that strategy is war on the map is no figure of speech. Napoleon
always planned and conducted his campaigns on maps of the country
spread out for him by his staff, and into these maps he stuck colored
pins to indicate where his divisions were to move. Having thus wrought
out his plan, he issued orders accordingly. To the general, the map is
a chessboard, and upon this he moves his troops as you or I move queen
and knight.
[Illustration: PARALLEL ORDER]
Previous to Cyrus, about 550 B.C., we have a record of nothing useful
to the modern soldier. Nimrod, Semiramis, Sesostris were no doubt
distinguished conquerors. But they have left nothing for us to profit
by. War was a physical, not an intellectual art, for many centuries.
Armies marched out to meet each other, and, if an ambush was not
practicable, drew up in parallel order, and fought till one gave way.
The greater force could form the longer line and overlap and turn the
other’s flanks. And then, as to-day, a flank attack was fatal; for men
cannot fight unless they face the foe; and a line miles in length needs
time to change its front.
[Illustration: BATTLE OF THYMBRA B.C. 545]
Cyrus is to the soldier the first historical verity. In the battle of
Thymbra, according to Xenophon, where Crœsus outnumbered him more than
two to one and overlapped his flanks, he disposed his troops in so deep
a tactical order of five lines, and so well protected his flanks, that
when Crœsus’ wings wheeled in to encompass him, his reserves in the
fifth line could fall on the flanks of these very wheeling wings. And
as the wheel was extensive and difficult of execution, it produced a
gap between wing and centre,--as Cyrus had expected,--and into this he
poured with a chosen body, took Crœsus’ centre in reverse, and utterly
overthrew him and his kingdom. Cyrus overran in his conquests almost as
great a territory as Alexander.
It is of advantage to see what had been done before Alexander’s
time,--to understand how much Alexander knew of war from others. For
Alexander found war in a crude state and conducted it with the very
highest art. That his successors did not do so is due to the fact that
they did not understand, or were not capable of imitating him.
Cyrus’ successor, Darius I. (B.C. 513), undertook a campaign against
the Scythians north of the Danube, with, it is said, seven hundred
thousand men. The Greek Mandrocles bridged for this army both the
Bosphorus and the Danube, no mean engineering feat to-day.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account