Great leaders: Historic portraits from the great historians
History
Great leaders: Historic portraits from the great historians
Biography
The impression which he made on Burnet was not favorable. The good
bishop could not understand that a mind which seemed to be chiefly
occupied with questions about the best place for a capstan and the best
way of rigging a jury-mast might be capable, not merely of ruling an
empire, but of creating a nation. He claimed that he had gone to see a
great prince, and had found only an industrious shipwright. Nor does
Evelyn seem to have formed a much more favorable opinion of his august
tenant. It was, indeed, not in the character of tenant that the czar was
likely to gain the good word of civilized men. With all the high
qualities which were peculiar to himself, he had all the filthy habits
which were then common among his countrymen. To the end of his life,
while disciplining armies, founding schools, framing codes, organizing
tribunals, building cities in deserts, joining distant seas by
artificial rivers, he lived in his palace like a hog in a sty; and, when
he was entertained by other sovereigns, never failed to leave on their
tapestried walls and velvet state beds unequivocal proof that a savage
had been there. Evelyn’s house was left in such a state that the
Treasury quieted his complaints with a considerable sum of money.
Toward the close of March the czar visited Portsmouth, saw a sham
sea-fight at Spithead, watched every movement of the contending fleets
with intense interest, and expressed in warm terms his gratitude to the
hospitable government which had provided so delightful a spectacle for
his amusement and instruction. After passing more than three months in
England, he departed in high good-humor.
DUKE OF MARLBOROUGH.
BY WILLIAM EDWARD HARTPOLE LECKY.
[John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough, born 1650, died 1722. All his
early fortunes were due to the favor of James II, but he deserted
his patron, and his intrigues carried over a large following of the
English nobility to the cause of the Prince of Orange. For this he
was rewarded with the dukedom of Marlborough. Politically
Marlborough was a traitor to nearly every cause he served, and was
continually plotting to undermine William as he had done in the
case of James. To Anne, under whom he reaped his great military
glory, though he had distinguished himself at an earlier period, he
was probably loyal. The victories which established his place among
the leading soldiers of modern times were Blenheim, in 1704;
Ramillies, in 1706; Oudenarde, in 1708; Malplaquet, in 1709; and
the capture of Bouchain, in 1711. He achieved eminence as a
statesman and administrator as well as a soldier, but it is in the
latter capacity that he ranks among the great men of the world.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account