Great Testimony against scientific crueltyColeridge, Stephen
Philosophy
Great Testimony against scientific cruelty
Coleridge, Stephen
Vivisection
The _Idlers_ that sport only with inanimate nature may claim some
indulgence; if they are useless, they are still innocent; but there
are others, whom I know not how to mention without more emotion than
my love of quiet willingly admits. Among the inferior professors of
medical knowledge is a race of wretches whose lives are only varied
by varieties of cruelty; whose favourite amusement is to nail dogs to
tables and open them alive; to try how long life may be continued in
various degrees of mutilation, or with the excision or laceration of
the vital parts; to examine whether burning irons are felt more
acutely by the bone or tendon; and whether the more lasting agonies
are produced by poison forced into the mouth, or injected into the
veins, it is not without reluctance that I offend the sensibility of
the tender mind with images like these. If such cruelties were not
practised it were to be desired that they should not be conceived;
but, since they are published every day with ostentation, let me be
allowed once to mention them, since I mention them with abhorrence.
_Mead_ has invidiously remarked of _Woodward_ that he gathered shells
and stones, and would pass for a philosopher. With pretentions much
less reasonable the anatomical novice tears out the living bowels of
an animal and styles himself physician, prepares himself by familiar
cruelty for that profession which he is to exercise upon the tender
and the helpless, upon feeble bodies and broken minds, and by which
he has opportunities to extend his arts and torture, and continue
those experiments upon infancy and age, which he has hitherto tried
upon cats and dogs. What is alleged in defence of these hateful
practices everyone knows, but the truth is that by knives, fire, and
poisons, knowledge is not always sought, and is very seldom attained.
I know not that by living dissections any discovery has been made by
which a single malady is more easily cured. And if the knowledge of
physiology has been somewhat increased, he surely buys knowledge dear
who learns the use of the lacteals at the expense of his own
humanity. It is time that a universal resentment should arise
against those horrid operations, which tend to harden the heart and
make the physician more dreadful than the gout or the stone.
CHAPTER VIII: THOMAS CARLYLE
VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY
The world of letters and of ethics has hardly yet settled whether much of
the teaching of the Sage of Chelsea should be the subject of praise or
blame.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account