Great Testimony against scientific cruelty — John Shaqi
Great Testimony against scientific crueltyColeridge, Stephen
Philosophy
Great Testimony against scientific cruelty
Coleridge, Stephen
Vivisection
"It is clear," he said, "that the words 'kill and eat,' and the dominion
which the beneficent Maker of all things has given to man over the lower
creatures, does not justify the infliction of exquisite torment in the
name of Science."
At that time Lord Shaftesbury was the greatest representative of the
Church of England and the Cardinal the acknowledged head of the Church of
Rome in this country and as they earnestly agreed in condemning the
practice of vivisection as wicked and abominable, it becomes impossible
for those who support it to bring to its defence any authorities on
conduct at all comparable with that of these two great and good men.
The Cardinal gave the impression of a consciously eminent
ecclesiastic, who was determined to lift his Church into greatness in
England by all lawful means in his power; his appearance was ascetic,
distinguished, and memorable; he was manifestly a man of direct
nobility of life, and most lofty purpose--a great statesman for his
Church, leading an austere and detached life as an example in every
detail for the faithful in his community--a prince of the Roman
Church fulfilling his august function conspicuously and faultlessly
in full view of a critical public. {16}
His care for the poor and the noble simplicity of his life found its most
eloquent evidence at his death in the discovery that his entire worldly
possessions amounted to sixty-eight pounds.
He had laid up his treasure where no rust and moth doth corrupt.
CHAPTER IV: ROBERT BROWNING
VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY
DIED THE 12TH OF DECEMBER, 1889
[Picture: Robert Browning. From a painting by Samuel Laurence in the
collection of John Lane]
Towards the end of 1874, as I have already remarked, Miss Cobbe prepared
a petition to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
of which the chief paragraph ran as follows:--
It is earnestly urged by your memorialists that the great and
influential Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
may see fit to undertake the task (which appears strictly to fall
within its province) of placing suitable restrictions on this rapidly
increasing evil. The vast benefit to the cause of humanity which the
Society has in the past half century effected, would, in our humble
estimation, remain altogether one-sided and incomplete, if, while
brutal carters and ignorant costermongers are brought to punishment
for maltreating the animals under their charge, learned and refined
gentlemen should be left unquestioned to inflict far more exquisite
pain upon still more sensitive creatures; as if the mere allegation
of a scientific purpose removed them above all legal or moral
responsibility.
Miss Cobbe, confident of what Browning's reply would be, sent him this
petition and asked him to return it with his signature if he approved of
it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account