The most interesting part of our present inquiry is the comparison of
the ceremonies and the concept of sacrifice in East and West. At the
first glance we note, as usual, a certain general similarity. In the
earliest period we find various animals, both wild and domestic,
offered upon the altars, but in Babylonia no special rules concerning
their sex, such as were prescribed by ancient Greek and Judaic ritual.
In all these countries, again, bloodless offerings of cereals and
fruits were in common vogue; and in the earliest Babylonian period,
these were of great variety, an inscription of Gudea mentioning
butter, honey, wine, corn with milk, figs, dates, as the food of the
gods, “untouched by fire.”[230.2] We note here the distinction
familiar in Greek ritual, between ἔμπυρα and ἄπυρα ἱερά; only in
Babylonia it does not seem to have been of religious importance, nor
to have been developed, as it was in Hellas, into a ceremonial law
that might engender an important variation in the moral ideas and
religious concepts of the worshipper; for instance, the altar of {231}
Apollo at Delos was called καθαρός, “the pure altar,” because no blood
could be shed upon it, the sacrifices of Athena Lindia at Rhodes, and
of Zeus in certain mystic rites of Crete, were ἄπυρα, or “fireless,”
which was the technical name for the oblations of fruits and cereals;
and this fact of ritual suggested to later Greek philosophy the
ethical-religious view that the “pure,” that is to say, bloodless,
offering was the more acceptable oblation, and was a tradition of the
age of man’s innocence. This pregnant idea has not yet been discovered
in Mesopotamian or in any other old Semitic religion; the Babylonian
deities received both kinds, and perhaps simultaneously, though in
certain special ceremonies the sacred cake, or the liquid offerings of
milk, honey, wine, and oil, might suffice;[231.1] while, according to
the ancient Hebraic view, as the legend of Cain and Abel indicates,
the deity appears to prefer blood-sacrifice, though each species is
recognised in the pre-exilic sacral literature.[231.2]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account