There is another distinction observed in Greek ritual, that becomes of
some importance in the later history of ascetic purity, that between
wineless offerings (νηφάλια) and those accompanied with wine: the
former being preferred by the powers of the lower world,[231.3]
though not invariably, and certainly not by the departed hero. However
this distinction arose--and no single hypothesis explains all the
cases--it was not a Semitic tradition, taught in early days to Hellas.
For the {232} Semitic divinities, including Jahwé, have a genial
liking for wine “which cheereth God and man”;[232.1] nor have we any
Semitic example of a taboo on it, except possibly a late Nabataean
inscription from the neighbourhood of Palmyra, mentioning “the god who
drinks no wine.”[232.2] Such a phrase would certainly not apply to
the deities of Babylon; even the sun-god, who in Hellas appears to
have been a total abstainer, is offered wine in the Babylonian
service,[232.3] and, according to one verse in the _Epic of
Creation_, the deities actually get drunk,[232.4] a grossness which,
in the mythic imagination of Hellas, is only imagined as possible for
Dionysos.
We have the right to say, then, that the avoidance of wine in certain
religious services of Hellas helps to confirm the impression of its
early independence of Semitic influences. The Hellenic rule may, in
certain cases, have been derived from an older Aegean tradition; for
two of the deities to whom it was applied, Helios and Aphrodite, may
be believed to have been bequeathed to Greece by the Minoan-Mycenaean
religion; and wine appears to have been prohibited in certain
ceremonies of the Phrygian goddess,[232.5] and of a goddess of
Caria.[232.6]
These are differences of some importance, and doubtless of great
antiquity between the ritual of East and West; more insignificant, yet
of considerable value for {233} our present question, is the fact that
incense was a regular accompaniment of the Babylonian sacrifice, but
did not come into religious use in Greece till some time after the
period of Homer. The fact itself we may consider as proved, both by
Homer’s silence about it, and by the Homeric use of the word θύος,
which means “victim,” and never “incense,” as in later Greek it came
to mean. Had the influence of the Mesopotamian culture been as strong
on Greece in the second millennium as it came to be from 800 B.C.
onwards, we should certainly have expected that the religious use of
incense, which is very attractive and spreads easily from one race to
another, would have been adopted by Greek ritual before the time of
Homer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account