May we also regard her as the prototype of all the leading Hellenic
goddesses? The consideration of this question will bring this
particular line of inquiry to a close.
If we find goddess-supremacy among the early Hellenes, shall we
interpret it as an Aryan-Hellenic tradition, or as an alien and
borrowed trait in their composite religion? If borrowed, are they more
likely to have derived it from the East or from their immediate
predecessors in the regions of Aegean culture? The latter question, if
it arises, we ought to be able to answer at last.
We might guard ourselves at the outset against the uncritical dogma
which has been proclaimed at times that the goddesses in the various
Aryan polytheisms were all alien, and borrowed from the pre-Aryan
peoples in whose lands they settled. Any careful study of the Vedic
and old-Germanic, Phrygo-Thracian religions can refute this wild
statement: the wide prevalence in Europe of the worship of “Mother
Earth,” which Professor Dieterich’s treatise establishes,[94.1] is
sufficient evidence in itself. Nor could we believe that the early
Aryans were unmoved by an anthropomorphic law of the religious
imagination that is almost universally operative. The Hellenic Aryans,
then, must be supposed to have brought certain of their own goddesses
into Greece, and perhaps philology will be able one day to tell us who
exactly they were. On linguistic and other grounds, Dione and Demeter
may be accepted as provedly old Hellenic: on the same grounds,
probably, Hera; also the name and cult of Hestia is certainly
“Aryan,”[94.2] only we {95} dare not call her in the earliest, and
scarcely at any period, a true personal goddess. Now, there is a
further important induction that we may confidently make: at the
period when the Aryan conquerors were pushing their way into Aegean
lands and the Indo-Iranians into the Punjaub and Mesopotamia, they had
a religious bias making for the supremacy of the Father-God and
against the supremacy of the goddess. We can detect the same instinct
also in the old Germanic pantheon.[95.1] Its operation is most
visible when the Thrako-Phrygian stock, and their cousins the
Bithynian, broke into the north of Asia Minor, and the regions on the
south of the Black Sea. The god-cult they bring with them clashes with
the aboriginal and--as it proved--invincible supremacy of the goddess
linked to her divine boy: we hear of such strange cult-products as
Attis-Παπαῖος, Father Attis, and one of the old Aryan titles of the
High God appears in the Phrygian Zeus Βαγαῖος, Bagha in old Persian
and Bog in Slavonic meaning deity. The Aryan hero-ancestor of the
Phrygian stock, Manes, whom Sir William Ramsay believes to be
identical with the god Men, becomes the father of Atys;[95.2] also we
have later proof of the powerful cult of Zeus the Thunderer, Zeus the
Leader of Hosts, in this region of the southern shore of the Black
Sea. Another induction that I venture, perhaps incautiously, to make,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account