Neutrality was the natural and obvious policy of the Eleans. Removed by
their geographical situation from the main stress and turmoil of Greek
politics, they appreciated to the full the advantages of the position
which they had usurped as sole guardians of the Olympian precinct, and
lost no opportunity of enforcing and extending the privilege attaching
to that position. Thus they claimed for the whole of Elis the sanctity
belonging to the sacred plain; their lives were consecrated and their
territory immune from war.[203] Elis city was the official headquarters
of Olympia, with which it was connected by a sacred road, and there all
competitors were forced to assemble to undergo a month’s training before
the games. Yet the scanty records of history show that the immunity
enjoyed by the Eleans was due more to the accident of their position
than to a general recognition of their sanctity. Religious scruples,
though often convenient as an excuse, were seldom allowed to stand in
the way of more practical considerations. Hence the Eleans, however
anxious to preserve their neutrality, could not avoid being involved in
the complications caused by the Peloponnesian war. Sparta must have
regarded with jealousy and suspicion the influence possessed by Athens
and the growth of democracy in the new state. In Triphylia and Arcadia
the cause of the Pisatans was still popular, and the control of Elis was
regarded as an act of usurpation. It was in connection with Lepreum, one
of the cities of the old Pisatan league, that difficulties arose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account