In the first part of this work I have endeavoured to write a continuous
history of Greek athletics. The attempt is an ambitious one, perhaps too
ambitious for one whose occupation has left him little time for
continuous study. The long period covered involves a multitude of
difficult and disputed problems, which it is impossible within the
limits of this work to discuss fully. In all these cases I have
endeavoured to sift the evidence for myself, and to form an independent
judgment. Many of the details may be obscure, and many of my conclusions
are doubtless open to criticism. Yet the general outline of the story is
clear, and I venture to think that it has a more than passing interest
and importance.
The second part is more technical, though it may perhaps appeal to those
who are actively interested in athletics. It consists of a number of
chapters, each complete in itself, dealing with the details of Greek
athletics. Many of the chapters are taken from articles published by me
in the _Journal of Hellenic Studies_. The chapters on the Stadium, the
Gymnasium, the Hippodrome and Boxing are entirely new. In the first two
of these chapters will be found the latest results of excavations at
Delphi, Epidaurus, Priene and Pergamum, results which are not readily
accessible to the English reader.
The arrangement of the work has involved a certain amount of repetition,
and the introduction separately and in their historical order of certain
details which it would be clearer perhaps, and certainly more
picturesque, to group together. But it seemed to me worth while to
sacrifice something of clearness and effect in order to bring out the
historical aspect of the subject, an aspect which is completely obscured
in most of our text-books. Further, I have endeavoured clearly to
distinguish between what is certain and what is conjectural. The words
“perhaps” and “possibly” recur, I am only too conscious, with monotonous
persistence. But where the evidence is too inadequate or too
contradictory to admit of certainty, the only safe and honest course is
to confess ignorance and to hope that the discovery of some new
manuscript may dispel our doubts. The neglect of this distinction
between the conjectural and the certain has been a fertile source of
error.
Great importance has been attached to the evidence of contemporary
monuments, and illustrations have been given of the principal monuments
described. In their selection preference has been given _ceteris
paribus_ to objects in the British Museum, because these are likely to
be most accessible to the majority of readers. In the case of vases the
interpretation often depends on the composition, and whole scenes have
as far as possible been reproduced rather than single figures. Museum
references are appended to the illustrations wherever available, and
also some indication of the date of the objects illustrated. Literary
references will be found in the list of illustrations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account