Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
Two real or apparent defects must be noted. Firstly, we are shocked, or
we should be shocked, by the actions (if not the character) of Ajax—a
point often disregarded, probably through an idea that his bloodshed
was caused by madness. But the goddess, by so deluding him, turned his
rage from man to beast. He makes a deliberate attempt to murder the
Atridæ in their sleep, together with an indefinitely large number of
their followers, and this in the course of a campaign. It can hardly
be doubted that the doom pronounced by the general, that such a man
(to ignore his personality for the moment) shall not be buried, would
have met with faint reprobation, either at the time supposed or among
the contemporaries of the poet. Again, the indifference with which Ajax
treats Tecmessa amounts to sheer brutality. Many readers have supposed
that the prince cherishes affection for her, but conceals it under a show
of roughness to avoid “breaking down”. This is a mere fancy. Nothing in
Ajax’ conduct, and practically[305] nothing in his words, betrays any
interest whatsoever in Tecmessa. The man is absorbed almost entirely by
his sense of wounded dignity. He bids an affectionate farewell to his
child, he speaks lovingly of his own parents and of Teucer; but nothing
can prevent him from escaping disgrace by self-destruction. When about to
fall upon his sword he mingles with his farewells a fierce behest to the
Furies to destroy the whole Greek host which has slighted him. So far as
the first part of this tragedy is concerned, Ajax is a magnificent brute;
he is better dead.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account