Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
The second difficulty is that Ajax dies at v. 865, but the play continues
for five or six hundred lines more. This great space is occupied by a
long dispute about his burial, which modern readers find tedious. But the
difficulty arises from a mischievous idea that the culmination of every
tragedy is the hero’s death. Often it is only a step towards the real
crisis. In _Ajax_ the theme is not his death, but his rehabilitation: the
disgrace, the suicide, the veto on his burial, Teucer’s defiance, the
persuasions of Odysseus, are all absolutely necessary. The culminating
point is the dispute about his burial, especially since Ajax was one of
the Attic “heroes,” and the centre of a hero’s cult was his tomb.[306]
This explanation enables us to regard the whole play as an organic unity.
It helps, moreover, to meet the first difficulty—the character of Ajax.
It must be remembered that a man became a “hero” not necessarily through
any nobility or holiness of his life. It was rather the fact that he had
passed through strange, unnatural experiences, had even committed morbid
crimes, so long as those offences were purged by strange sufferings and
death, violent, superhuman, or pitiable. Such was Œdipus, and such is
Ajax. Greek feeling would have made a “hero” of Lear, of Hamlet, perhaps
of Othello. Ajax is a man of essentially noble mould—this the speeches of
Teucer express admirably—who sins deeply and suffers strangely. That he
happens to evoke less admiration from us than the other tragic figures
just mentioned matters little. Lack of tenderness towards women was the
rule at Athens; and hatred of enemies, which Ajax carried to such insane
length, was commoner still. But what of the lowered tone which marks the
end of the tragedy? Teucer’s speech on the warlike achievements of his
brother is, indeed, beyond praise; but much of his other remarks, and of
the language held by the Atridæ, is mere brawling. But these quarrels
bring into relief the proud nobility of the man who lies between the
disputants, dead because he would not stay to rehabilitate himself by
such bickering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account