Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
Though during his own time Euripides was hardly equal in repute to his
two companions, scarcely had his Macedonian grave closed over him than
his popularity began to overshadow theirs. Æschylus became a dim antique
giant; Sophocles, though always admired, was too definitely Attic and
Periclean to retain all his prestige in the Hellenistic world. It was
the more cosmopolitan poet who won posthumous applause from one end of
the civilized earth to the other. From 400 B.C. to the downfall of the
ancient world he was unquestionably better known and admired than any
other dramatist. This is shown by the much larger collection of his
work which has survived, by the imitation of later playwrights, and
by innumerable passages of citation, praise, and comment in writers
of every kind. He shared with Homer, Vergil, and Horace the equivocal
distinction of becoming a schoolbook even in ancient times. Nine of our
nineteen plays were selected for this purpose: _Alcestis_, _Andromache_,
_Hecuba_, _Hippolytus_, _Medea_, _Orestes_, _Phœnissæ_, _Rhesus_, and
_Troades_. It is not easy to see what principle of selection prompted the
educationists of the day: _Andromache_ and _Hippolytus_ do not strike a
modern reader as specially “suitable”. Owing to their use in schools they
were annotated; these _scholia_ are still extant and are often of great
value. In the Byzantine age the number was reduced to three: _Hecuba_,
_Orestes_, _Phœnissæ_.
Among the numerous lesser tragedians of the fifth century five hold a
distinguished place: Neophron of Sicyon, Aristarchus of Tegea, Ion of
Chios, Achæus of Eretria, Agathon of Athens.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account