Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
[191] The slovenliness in this regard of many modern actors is mostly due
to “long runs”. After saying the same thing hundreds of times, an actor
naturally tends to mechanical diction. The writer has heard a performer
in an emotional crisis suddenly (as it appeared) call for champagne.
Feeling sure that “Pommery” could not be right, he reflected, and
discovered that the mysterious syllables meant “Poor Mary!” Even actors
at the head of the profession are guilty of such things as “the lor of
Venice”.
[192] See Haigh³, p. 279 _sq._, for some highly interesting extracts.
[193] _Poetic_ 1456_a_ (tr. Butcher).
[194] _Ibid._
[195] This was the normal mode of entry, but the plot sometimes demanded
others. In the _Eumenides_ the Chorus rush in pell-mell; so probably in
the _Bacchæ_; in the Euripidean _Supplices_ they are discovered grouped
around the Queen.
[196] See pp. 344 _sq._
[197]
ὥστ’ εἴ τις ὀρχοῖτ’ εὖ, θέαμ’ ἦν· νῦν δὲ δρῶσιν οὐδέν,
ἀλλ’ ὥσπερ ἀπόπληκτοι βάδην ἑστῶτες ὠρύονται.
[198] Haigh³, p. 318. Both the gestures described sound like a curious
anticipation of the gestures favoured by the performers of “coon-songs”.
[199] This was not always an advantage when comedy held the scene. There
is a delightfully impudent passage in the _Frogs_ (v. 297) where Dionysus
to escape a hobgoblin appeals to his own priest for protection.
[200] For a detailed description of the seating see Haigh³, pp. 94-101.
[201] It is a fact familiar to students of comparative religion that
obscenity is often a part of ritual. This is true of several Greek
worships, including that of Dionysus. Hence even tragedy retained its
satyric complement, though satyric drama regularly showed obscene
features.
[202] Puchstein would date it earlier (end of the fifth century).
[203] Plutarch, _Liber Amatorius_, 756 B, C.
[204] ἐκσυρίττειν (“to hiss off”).
[205] Demosthenes, _De Falsa Legatione_, § 337.
[206] _Ethics_, X, 1175 B.
[207] _Date_: uncertain. Professor Tucker thinks the year 492-1 probable;
Æschylus was then thirty-three years old. Historical considerations are
here of doubtful value, but the technique of the play seems to prove
beyond question that it is an early work.
_Arrangement_: protagonist, Danaus, Egyptian herald; deuteragonist, King
of Argos.
[208] In the centre of the orchestra, as always.
[209] Danaus is necessarily dismissed so that the actor who impersonates
him may appear as the Egyptian herald.
[210] vv. 991-2.
[211] vv. 994-1013.
[212] Ζεύς (or words derived therefrom) occurs about sixty times.
[213] vv. 91-5 (Professor Tucker’s translation).
[214] vv. 230-1.
[215] _Date_: 472 B.C. _Arrangement_: protagonist, Atossa and Xerxes;
deuteragonist, Messenger and Darius.
[216] The actor who presents the queen has now to present the king.
[217] This was a satyric play, and must not be confused with the extant
_Prometheus_.
[218] See Patin, _Eschyle_, p. 211.
[219] _Henry V_, IV, viii.
[220] vv. 361-2.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account