Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
Such a cumbersome equipment would be fatal to acting as we understand it.
The mask at once destroys all chance of that facial play which we deem
essential; the padded limbs, heavy garments, and gigantic boots made all
life-like motion and _élan_ impossible. This is no doubt one great reason
why the playwrights rarely exhibit exciting physical action. Even so, the
ludicrous sometimes occurred. Æschines when acting Œnomaus fell and had
to be helped up by the chorus-trainer.[183] A natural supposition is that
these impedimenta date not from Æschylus but from the period of vulgar
elaboration. Certainly, it is not easy to imagine how such scenes as the
delirium of Orestes, or the departure of Pentheus in the _Bacchæ_, could
have been reasonably carried out—so to say—on stilts; indeed the whole
spirit of such plays as _Orestes_, _Ion_, and _Iphigenia at Aulis_ seems
utterly alien to such equipment. But it is hard to set aside the voice
of all the evidence. The best way would be to surmise that Euripides
sometimes dispensed with buskins and the rest—though we should surely
expect some allusion to so remarkable a change—for noble as is the work
of his predecessors, it could be so performed without too absurd an
effect. If Garrick’s audience did not object to his playing Macbeth in a
periwig and knee-breeches, it is likely enough that Athens was content
with such a Clytæmnestra as Pollux would have us imagine.
V. THE PERFORMERS AND THEIR WORK
A tragic performance was carried out by actors, extra performers,
flute-player, and chorus. All these were men.
Extra performers, though they take up very little space in our text,
were important to the spectacle. Mutes were often needed. Not only did
these figure as attendants, crowds, and the like; they are sometimes
important to the plot though they do not happen to speak. The jury of
Areopagites in _Eumenides_ is vital; children such as Eurysaces in
_Ajax_, and the sons[184] of Medea, are important. Other extra performers
were those who had very small speaking or singing parts, such as Eumelus
in _Alcestis_. This would seem to mean a fourth actor, but, so slight
was the part always[185] allotted, that it is not an unreasonable
statement that there were never more than three actors. Thirdly, an extra
chorus was occasionally needed for a short scene, as the Propompi in
_Eumenides_ and the Huntsmen in _Hippolytus_. Any such extra performer
was called a _parachoregema_ (παραχορήγημα, “extra supply”) and was paid
by the choregus, as the name shows. (The regular chorus was paid by the
State.) At times a chorus sang behind the scenes and was then called a
“parascenion”; this function would, if possible, be performed by members
of the regular chorus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account