Guide to the study of animal ecologyAdams, Charles C. (Charles Christopher)
Science
Guide to the study of animal ecology
Adams, Charles C. (Charles Christopher)
Animal ecology
It is of course advantageous in some ways to have agreement as to
the limitations of ecology, or any science, but even the more exact
sciences seem to fare little better, as is shown by the following
statement: “It is not long since I heard a university professor begin
a lecture on physics somewhat in this way: ‘Physics is the science
of matter and energy. This field is so large that it is customary at
present to break off the physics of the molecule and its reactions and
call it chemistry. Also to put to one side the physics of the heavenly
bodies and call this a part of astronomy,’ etc.” (Strong, Science, N.
S., Vol. XXXIV, p. 409, 1911.)
FORBES, S. A.
1895. On Contagious Disease in the Chinch-Bug (_Blissus leucopterus_
Say). 19th Rep. State Ent. Ill. (8th Rep. of S. A. Forbes), pp. 16-176.
In this paper Forbes defines (pp. 16-18) ecology and points out, I
believe for the first time, that economic entomology is simply applied
ecology. He says, “The study of œcology is thus to the economic
entomologist what the study of physiology is to the physician.”
1909. Aspects of Progress in Economic Entomology. Journ. Econ. Ent.,
Vol. II, pp. 25-35.
Especially pp. 28-32 on the relation of ecology to economic entomology.
HERDMANN, W. A.
1896. Oceanography, Bionomics, and Aquiculture. Smithsonian Report for
1895, pp. 433-454.
EMERY, C.
1905. Éthologie, Phylogénie et Classification. C. R. 6me Cong. inter.
de Zool. Berne, 1904, pp. 160-174.
CLEMENTS, F. E.
1905. The Foundations of Ecology, pp. 1-17.
Research Methods in Ecology, pp. 334. Lincoln, Nebraska.
ADAMS, CHAS. C.
1906. Introductory Note. An Ecological Survey in Northern Michigan.
Ann. Rep. Mich. Geol. Surv. for 1905, pp. 11-12.
1909. The Ecological Succession of Birds. Ann. Rep. Mich. Geol. Surv.
for 1908, pp. 121-154.
SHELFORD, V. E.
1912. Ecological Succession. V. Aspects of Physiological
Classification. Biol. Bull., Vol. XXIII, pp. 331-370.
The standpoint of this paper is very much in harmony with that advanced
in this book.
CASE, E. C.
1905. Œcological Features of Evolution. Bull. Wis. Nat. Hist. Soc.,
Vol. III, pp. 169-180.
WHEELER, W. M.
1905. Ethology and the Mutation Theory. Science, N. S., Vol. XXI, pp.
535-540.
FLAHAULT, C., and SCHRÖTER, C.
1910. Phytogeographical Nomenclature. Reports and Propositions. IIIᵉ
Cong. Inter. de Botanique. Bruxelles, 1910. pp. 28 + x. Zurich.
WHITE, C. A.
1893. The Relation of Biology to Geological Investigation. Ann. Rep. U.
S. Nat. Mus. for 1892, pp. 245-368.
This paper and the two following references illustrate the intimate
relation of ecology to phases of geology.
GRABAU, A. W.
1899. The Relation of Marine Bionomy to Stratigraphy. Bull. Buffalo
Soc. Nat. Sci., Vol. VI, pp. 319-367.
WALTHER, J.
1893-94. Einleitung in die Geologie als historische Wissenschaft.
I. Bionomie des Meeres. II. Die Lebensweise der Meeresthiere. III.
Lithogenesis der Gegenwart. Jena.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account