Gunpowder and Ammunition, Their Origin and ProgressHime, H. W. L. (Henry William Lovett)
History
Gunpowder and Ammunition, Their Origin and Progress
Hime, H. W. L. (Henry William Lovett)
Ammunition; Gunpowder
About the beginning of the eighteenth century most countries had
reduced their powders to two or three, which were of the same
composition, and differed only in grain. In 1742 Benjamin Robins,
by his “New Principles of Gunnery,” placed gunnery upon a strictly
scientific basis, and by his epoch-making invention of the ballistic
pendulums[483] enabled gunners for the first time to measure the
muzzle-velocity of projectiles with considerable accuracy. It may have
been owing to the lessons taught by this instrument that, between
1742 and 1781, we changed the proportions of the ingredients of
our powder from 75—12½—12½ to 75—15—10. Profiting by the rapid
progress of electricity during the first half of the nineteenth
century, Sir Charles Wheatstone proposed in 1840 his electro-magnetic
chronoscope,[484] which registered to the 1/730 part of a second, to
replace Robins’ ponderous pendulum.
Wheatstone’s instrument was not adopted by our Government, but his
idea was followed up and improved upon by Captain Navez, of the
Belgian Artillery, who in 1847 brought forward his electro-ballistic
pendulum.[485] Only one instrument was now wanting to enable the
mechanical effect of the explosion to be directly and completely
observed—an instrument to measure the pressure upon the bore of the
gun; and this want was supplied in 1861 when Captain T. J. Rodman,
Ordnance Department, United States Army, produced his Indenting
Apparatus and his Internal Pressure Gauge.[486] The following Table
gives the results of some experiments with the new instruments:—
TABLE VI.
_Showing the connection between the Size of the Grain, Muzzle Velocity,
and Pressure on Bore._
+-------------+---------+-----------+-----------+------------------+
| Diameter of | Charge. | Weight of | Muzzle | Pressure on |
| Grains. | Lbs. | Shot. | Velocity. | Bottom of Bore. |
| Ins. | | Lbs. | F.s. | Tons per Sq. In. |
+-------------+---------+-----------+-----------+------------------+
| .1 | 8 | 43 | 1261 | 21.5 |
| .15 | ” | ” | 1235 | 21.0 |
| .2 | ” | ” | 1199 | 18.8 |
| .25 | ” | ” | 1151 | 17.1 |
| .3 | ” | ” | 1146 | 15.3 |
| .4 | ” | ” | 1187 | 14.2 |
+-------------+---------+-----------+-----------+------------------+
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account