Gunpowder and Ammunition, Their Origin and ProgressHime, H. W. L. (Henry William Lovett)
History
Gunpowder and Ammunition, Their Origin and Progress
Hime, H. W. L. (Henry William Lovett)
Ammunition; Gunpowder
This Table shows that as the size of the grain slowly increases,
the muzzle velocity decreases very slowly, and the pressure on the
bore decreases very quickly. The consequence of this discovery was
the manufacture of various very large grained powders such as pebble
powder, &c., for heavy guns. But the thorough knowledge of the
mechanical effect of the explosion of gunpowder gained by the use of
the Navez and Rodman instruments, was of little avail to anybody, for
gunpowder had nearly run its course. Just twenty-five years after the
introduction of the pressure gauge M. Vieille put the French Government
in possession of a nitrocellulose explosive,[487] and gunpowder was
added to the list of things that were.
Throughout the whole gunpowder period enthusiasts seem never to have
been wanting who believed in the possibility of making smokeless
powder and noiseless powder. Castner’s powder, which contained only
3 per cent, sulphur, seems to have been the nearest approach to the
former, but no powder containing sulphur could be absolutely smokeless.
Whether early gunners suspected this or not I do not know; certain it
is, however, that sulphurless powder was under discussion centuries
ago. Rabelais (who may have heard soldiers talking about the matter)
alludes jokingly to “pouldre de canon curieusement composée, degressée
de son soulfre.”[488] In 1756 the French actually experimented with
sulphurless mixtures, one of which (80 per cent. sulph. and 20 per
cent. ch.) gave good results in range, with very little smoke. It
proved to be worthless for military purposes from the difficulty
of corning it, and from its crumbling to dust during ordinary
transport.[489] The belief in a noiseless powder was scoffed at by
Whitehorne: “There be many who bring up lies, saying that they can tell
how to make pouder that shooting in gunnes shall make no noise, the
which is impossible.” A century afterwards Sir Thomas Browne believed
means might be adopted, if not to stifle the sound altogether, at least
“to abate the vigour thereof, or silence its bombulation.”[490]
Tables VII. and VIII. give the composition of gunpowder at various
times.
TABLE VII.
_English Gunpowder._
+---------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+----------+
| | 1250[491]| 1482[492]| 1569[493]| 1578[494] | 1588[495]| 1595[496]| 1695[497]|
| | _cir._ | _cir._ | | | | | |
+---------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+----------+
|Saltpetre| 41.2 | 66.6´ | 50.0 | 66.6´ | 71.4 | 75.0 | 75 |
|Charcoal | 29.4 | 22.2´ | 33.3´ | 16.6´ | 14.3 | 12.5 | 15 |
|Sulphur | 29.4 | 11.1´ | 16.6´ | 16.6´ | 14.3 | 12.5 | 10 |
+---------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+----------+
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account