Gutenberg, and the Art of PrintingPearson, Emily C. (Emily Clemens)
History
Gutenberg, and the Art of Printing
Pearson, Emily C. (Emily Clemens)
Gutenberg, Johann, 1397?-1468
“Behold some of my handicraft!” showing her a number of cards.
“Ah, and so you did not give up the project? and you have succeeded so
well! One could not distinguish between these and the old ones, save
that these are newer and fresher.”
“Nevertheless, this is but a step; it availeth me little till I can
frame letters, and impress them on vellum in like manner. It remains
that I try thy name, my Anna. I cannot fail to engrave that name on
wood, which hath been so long traced on my heart!” And to his loving
glance there beamed a happy light in her eyes, and her cheeks were
aglow, as he betook him to writing her name on a small wooden tablet.
Cutting away the wood, except the writing lines, he left the letters
raised, or in relief, and thus formed a stamp of his wife’s name.
Moistening it with ink, he placed a piece of paper over it, and, gently
pressing it upon the letters, beheld, on lifting it, the word imprinted
upon the paper.
[Illustration: Anna]
We of this age of books and papers cannot enter into his emotions. But
Anna could, and so the good man did not miss our sympathy.
“Famously done!” she exclaimed; “it is the likeness of writing.”
Does this seem to us a curious commendation of printing, that it
resembled writing? But the manuscript letter was the only one known as
yet, and it was natural to judge the result of the new experiment by
its agreement with that letter.
“Aye, I think myself it is not a failure,” said Gutenberg; “and I fancy
it would not be difficult for me to produce a copy of that picture of
‘St. Christopher,’ I mean by suitable patience and perseverance.”
“But was not that done with a pen?”
“Nay: it appears so, but on examination I find that it was made with
an engraved block;” and taking the rude print from the wall, he showed
upon the back of it the marks of the stylus, or burnisher by which it
was rubbed upon the letters. “Rest assured from this that they were
never produced by a pen, as in common writing.”
“Well,” returned the good wife, “it would truly be a pious act to
multiply the picture of ‘St. Christopher,’ since a blessing will follow
him who looketh upon it. I would fain have one in our sleeping-room,
that my eyes may light upon it when I awake.”
Poor Anna! she had already forgotten Gutenberg’s sensible remark on a
former occasion. Educated to attach a superstitious value to sacred
pictures, she still relied on them. This perverted trust, however,
shows that she felt her need of the protection and favor of a higher
than human power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account