Guy Fawkes; Or, A Complete History Of The Gunpowder Treason, A.D. 1605Lathbury, Thomas
History
Guy Fawkes; Or, A Complete History Of The Gunpowder Treason, A.D. 1605
Lathbury, Thomas
Gunpowder Plot, 1605
The narrative has already been brought down to the autumn of 1605, when
the parliament was prorogued from October to November the 5th. On
Saturday evening, October 26, ten days previous to the day fixed for the
opening of parliament, a letter, addressed to Lord Monteagle, was
delivered, by a person unknown, to his lordship’s footman, in the
street, with a strict injunction to deliver it into his master’s own
hands. This circumstance took place at seven o’clock, just as the
nobleman was about to sit down to supper. The letter was put into his
lordship’s hand by the servant. On opening it, he found it written in a
very illegible hand, and without date or subscription. Monteagle
summoned one of his attendants, to assist him in deciphering the
epistle, which was couched in the following terms:—
“My lord,
“Out of the love I bear to some of your friends, I have a care
of your preservation; therefore, I would advise you, as you
tender your life, to devise some excuse to shift off your
attendance at this parliament; for God and man have concurred to
punish the wickedness of this time. And think not slightly of
this advertisement, but retire yourself into your country, where
you may expect the event in safety. For though there be no
appearance of any stir, _yet I say they shall receive a terrible
blow this parliament, and yet they shall not see who hurts
them_. This council is not to be contemned, because it may do
you good, and can do you no harm; _for the danger is past, as
soon as you have burnt the letter_: and I hope God will give you
the grace to make a good use of it, to whose holy protection I
commend you[12].”
[Footnote 12: “A strange letter, from a strange hand, by a
strange messenger: without date to it, name at it, and (I had
almost said) sense in it. A letter which, even when it was
opened, was still sealed, such the affected obscurity
therein.”—FULLER. Book x. 26.]
Dark, indeed, were the words. In the first instance, Monteagle viewed
the matter as a _hoax_, intended to prevent him from attending the
opening of the session. Still he deemed it the safest course not to
conceal its contents. Accordingly he hastened off to Whitehall at that
late hour, when, too, the streets of London were not lighted as they are
in our day, and submitted the letter to the earl of Salisbury, Cecil,
one of the secretaries of state. It does not appear that Cecil laid much
stress upon the letter; at the same time he expressed an opinion, that
it might refer to some design of the papists, respecting which he had
received some information from various quarters. His information,
however, did not relate to any plot; but merely to an attempt, on the
part of the Romanists, at the commencement of the session, to obtain a
toleration for their worship, and the relaxation of some of the penal
laws.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account