H.M.I.: Some Passages in the Life of One of H.M. Inspectors of SchoolsSneyd-Kynnersley, E. M. (Edmund McKenzie)
History
H.M.I.: Some Passages in the Life of One of H.M. Inspectors of Schools
Sneyd-Kynnersley, E. M. (Edmund McKenzie)
Education -- Great Britain; School management and organization -- Great Britain
With the aid of all these officials, and in spite of many obstacles
offered by an army of lesser servants, called “writers” and “boys,” who
hid, or lost, documents of vital importance with the easy unconcern of
a slavey in lodgings, we made rapid progress. Once, when I complained
that the progress was not sufficiently rapid, I was taught a valuable
lesson: “you must remember that in a Government office it doesn’t do to
make mistakes: it is better to go slow than to go wrong.”
Difficult cases arose at times, and these were referred to the higher
officers; on one or two occasions the direction of the Vice-President
was taken, and general rules were made. But, as a rule, it was
straightforward filling up of forms; Form A, if the parish supply was
complete; Form B, if there was a deficiency; and so on. When the cases
were settled, a notice was sent to the local officials, and publication
in local newspapers and on church doors was required.
By the terms of the Act objection might be made within a month after
the publication of the notice, and, as popular feeling had run high
during our enquiries, I looked forward to a general rising in North
Wales. But in due course I received an informal communication from
Whitehall: the month was up, and from all that “infected area” not an
objection had been received. I replied that this must not be taken
as evidence of acquiescence: it was July; the people were getting in
their hay and plundering the early tourist; when they were at liberty,
they would fight. “Pooh, pooh,” said the Office, “they have lost their
chance.”
A little disappointed, as a schoolboy might be, that there was to be
no fight, I went to Switzerland; returning in September, I found _one
letter_ awaiting me. It alleged that my proposal to unite the parish
of Llanon with the parish of Llanof was the most monstrous outrage on
common sense within the experience of the writer. Secondly, the writer
would be glad to know why I had not kept my appointment to meet him and
a neighbour on August 20. It gave me some satisfaction to reply that
the meeting to which he referred was fixed for August, 1871, and that,
as we were now in 1872, he and his neighbour were a year late.
No explanation was tendered by the complainant. I suspected that the
local Mrs. Mailsetter had intercepted the 1871 invitations, probably at
the instigation of some local politician, and had warmed them up a year
later.
Was Llanon wedded to Llanof? “Jeanie’s mairit weel eneuch,” said the
Scottish matron; “to be sure she canna abide her mon, but there’s aye
a something.” The subsequent proceedings interested me no more. Except
for occasional requests for information, I had no further concern with
the district, and though I have paid very many visits to the beautiful
country in these thirty-five years, it has always been as a tourist.
FOOTNOTES:
[10] A kindly critic points out that the line is merely an exact
translation from Lucan’s _Pharsalia_, II. 657--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account