H.M.I.: Some Passages in the Life of One of H.M. Inspectors of SchoolsSneyd-Kynnersley, E. M. (Edmund McKenzie)
History
H.M.I.: Some Passages in the Life of One of H.M. Inspectors of Schools
Sneyd-Kynnersley, E. M. (Edmund McKenzie)
Education -- Great Britain; School management and organization -- Great Britain
In Norwich the Dean was venerated. In London and Oxford he was famous
as a preacher: as a writer of religious books he had done excellent
work, which, if one may judge from advertisements, still holds its
ground. As a headmaster he had been less successful, and I gathered
from some slight conversation with him as Dean that the very name of
Rugby jarred on his ears. He was a scholar, a divine, a gentleman, a
saintly man, and a good companion: but there was something lacking,
something essential in dealing with boys. I doubt if he ever was a boy.
At Eton, as we learn from his biographer, his short sight debarred
him from games, and his “sapping” propensities made him so unpopular
with the drones that, although _bene natus, bene vestitus_, and _bene
doctus_, his election to the Debating Society, called Pop, was secured
only by the interposition of the headmaster.[15] This was Keate, and
probably he threatened to flog the Opposition.
When he was himself headmaster in after years, this want of sympathy
with athletes and drones must have limited his sphere of influence. In
some way he had failed to assimilate himself to Boy, and Boy saw that
something was wanting. Without boy-knowledge a headmaster is like a
coachman without horse-knowledge: he cannot drive.
I could fill many pages with stories of him, and many pages with
tributes to his excellent merits, but I forbear. As Inspector I had no
dealings with him. Peace be to his memory.
Both in the city and in the county my acquaintance during the three
years that I spent in East Anglia was almost wholly clerical. The
parochial clergy managed the schools, collected the funds, often
supplied a large share of the funds, and entertained the inspector. In
a short time I found that there was infinite variety in the seeming
monotony. Parson A. was literary, and his name was known to all men
of letters. B. was archæological, and had views about ruins. C. grew
bulbs, and the district was so badly arranged (_quâ_ C.) that his
school inspection came in January, when only the noses of his aconites,
snowdrops, and crocuses were visible; but from February to June, and
even later, he lived in splendid happiness.
D. grew coniferæ, a pursuit which requires expectation of long life;
E. grew orchids, and told me of his parlour-maid’s _bon mot_. She
was helping in some stage of the culture, and in amazement inquired
the name of the unsightly vegetable. “Orchids,” she was told. “And a
wera good name far un tew,” said the maiden with wholly unconscious
pleasantry; “awkidest things I ever handled.”
F. was absorbed in schools, and spent half his days there. G. added
to the cares of his life by doctoring the bodies of his flock. A
neighbouring duly qualified practitioner had threatened him with a
prosecution for manslaughter if any more of his patients died. One
likes to see the thing done properly, and _quâ medicus_ the Rector was
a nonconformist; _quâ artifex_ a blackleg.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account