Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of bothDoran, Dr. (John)
Philosophy
Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of both
Doran, Dr. (John)
Manners and customs
The puppet-plays at the fairs in Paris were got up with much
magnificence, and were wittily written,—but with as much indecency as
wit; particularly during the last years of Louis XIV. and the time of
the Regent. The puppets alone had full liberty of speech, when every
other sort of liberty was extinct. Le Sage and Piron, as I have said,
wrote pieces expressly for them. And while plays in France were acted in
puppet-shows, puppet-shows in England were introduced into plays. Of this
the ‘Bartholomew Fair’ of Jonson is a sufficient example. The _vogue_ of
the French puppets is proved by the fact that the Regent Duke of Orléans,
with his company of _roués_, often remained in the fair till long after
midnight, to witness representations where the coarser the wit the more
it was enjoyed.
All the _chefs-d’œuvre_ of the French stage were immediately parodied
on the puppet-boards; and saving the license of speech, the parody was
often superior to the original. It was so attractive that the regular
actors complained, and sought for the suppression of their wooden rivals.
But Punch and his brethren pleaded for their ancient privilege, “de
parler et de p⸺r.” The plea was held good, and the puppets triumphed
over the Thespians. The quarrel being a family one, it was of course
carried on with undying hostility. The puppet-players took every
opportunity of ridiculing the extravagances of the more serious stage.
When the custom of calling for “the author” of a successful new piece
was established, upon the example set of calling for Voltaire after the
first representation of ‘Merope,’ the puppets availed themselves of the
opportunity for caricaturing. “Le compère pressait Polichinelle de
lui faire entendre une de ses œuvres; et après avoir reçu une réponse
très-incongrue, le compère s’empressait de demander l’auteur! l’auteur!
satisfaction que s’empressait de lui donner Polichinelle, aux grands
éclats de rire de l’assemblée.”
The contrast with this will call up but a ghastly smile when we find
that while the crowd on the Place Louis XV. was waiting to witness the
execution of the King, Punch was being serio-comically guillotined in
one corner of the square, to the great delight of the spectators. Indeed
the ‘Vieux Cordelier’ tells us, that Punch daily filled up the intervals
of executions; and so varied the pleasures of the humane but impatient
multitude. But what neither the ‘Vieux Cordelier,’ nor M. Magnin tells
us, is the fate of this very Punch, or rather of the man and his wife
who exhibited the popular puppet. Their fate is recorded by the Marquis
de Custine. Punch, it appears, ventured on some jokes against the
Terrorists. His master and mistress were thereupon seized. They bore
their brief imprisonment with heroism, and they were executed on the spot
whereon had perished their sovereign and queen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account