Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of bothDoran, Dr. (John)
Philosophy
Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of both
Doran, Dr. (John)
Manners and customs
It may be said (and I hope without profanity) that sewing came in with
sin; or rather, it was one of the first consequences of the first crime.
Perhaps, for this reason, has a certain degree of contempt been inherited
by the professors of the art. The trade of a tailor is not honoured
with mention in any part of the Scriptures. Gardening was the early
occupation, and hence horticulture is accounted refined. Tubal Cain was
the first worker in iron; and from his time down to a very late period,
the employment which required much exercise of muscular strength had the
precedence of mere sedentary callings. The French, indeed, as becomes
a nation which prides itself as being the most particular touching the
external dressing of a man, has always confessed to a sort of tender
regard for the tailor. The vocation against which Gallic wits direct
their light-winged shafts, is that of the grocer. The _épicier_ with
them is a man whose soul does not rise above _lait de poule_ and cotton
nightcaps. He is generally the coward in farces, while heroism is not
made separable from the melancholy wielders of the needle.
In France however we may still trace a remnant of the time when the
highest honour was awarded to the pliers of the heaviest tools, or the
workmen whose vocation had a spice of peril in it. Thus the farrier
smith, in France, still enjoys a courtesy rank which places him on a
nominal equality with the tried commanders of valiant hosts; and if
Soult was Marshal of France, so every Gallic farrier is “_maréchal
ferrant_”—the marshal of the workers in iron.
As weavers and fullers are noticed in Holy Writ, while the tailor is
passed over in silence, it is probable that he had no distinct status
among the Jews, and that, during a long period at least, every man was
his own _costumier_. In other countries the tailor and the physician were
both slaves, and probably the first was as little or less of a bungler
than the second; for the _servus vestiarius_ could often improve the
outer man, when the _servus medicus_ could not do as much for the inner
one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account