England -- Antiquities, Roman; Hadrian's Wall (England); Walls, Roman -- England
Mr. F. G. Simpson's suggestion is that it may have been part of
Hadrian's original scheme of Forts and Vallum (or "Boundary"). With
the building of the Wall the bridge would have to become "defensive,"
and it would be necessary to make the water-passage as short as
possible. It would no longer be a matter of indifference, as when it
merely served as a passage-way and a boundary-line. Hence the very
massive later abutments, to narrow the width of the river-passage;
and this would sufficiently account for the fact that one of the
water-piers of the older bridge is embedded in the masonry of the
east land abutment of the later one.
The course of the river has changed since Roman times; it has swerved
to the west, so that the western abutment is quite under water, and
the eastern one is high and dry, and separated from the river by
quite a mountain of silt, overgrown with grass and trees.
The stones of which the abutments are built are very massive, one of
them measuring nearly 5 feet in length. They must have been brought
from the Black Pasture Quarry. Many of them have {78} lewis-holes in
them, for lifting; some of the holes have been filled up with cement.
The earlier parts have no lewis-holes in the stones, which were
evidently put in position by hand.
A continuous iron cramp follows the outline of the abutment where it
faces the river, being anchored inward by iron bars.
That Severus did repair the bridge there is little doubt, for the
feather-broaching which is characteristic of his period is to be seen
on some of the stones.
One of Trajan's coins shows a bridge with wooden arches. The later
bridge may have been like this, or they may both have been flat
wooden platform bridges. It is clear that some means of closing each
of the four water-openings by a kind of portcullis would be necessary
to prevent the passage of an enemy when the stream was low. In times
of "spate," these portcullises would have to be raised. A peculiar
barrel-shaped stone, 4 feet long, lying amongst the ruins, with holes
all round for the insertion of spokes, may have served as a
counterpoise in the process of raising; and two round stone pillars,
the remains of which also lie there, might have taken a part in the
same scheme. In Cumberland such a water-gate is called a "heck."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
{79}
[Illustration: Fig. 7.--Section of a stone (S) with a lewis-hole,
showing the method of lifting by means of a lewis. The two
wedge-shaped pieces of iron, A, A, are first inserted in the hole,
and the third piece, B, is then placed between them. The pin of the
lifting-tackle, C, is then passed through all three pieces.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account