He very carefully read the paper again. Who in the world could have
collected such a mass of apparently convincing evidence? He was
beginning to study the question from His usual stand-point of personal
unconcern. His own written words were cited in proof of the allegations
here made against Him. He knew them for His own written words. Who in
the world so ingeniously could have distorted their signification:
so skilfully could have mispresented Him? At some time in His life,
He (perhaps inadvertently) must have trodden upon some human worm;
and the worm now had turned and stung Him. He sought for a sign, a
trace;--and found it---- Of course;--and the motive simultaneously
leaped to light. It was payment of a grudge, owed to Him by a detected
letter-thief, a professional infidel, whom He had scathed with barbed
sarcasms about ten years ago. There was something more than that.
Again He studied the paper for corroboration. How came the _Catholic
Hour_, of all papers, to publish a denunciation of Him? He noted that
the _Catholic Hour_ pretended its denunciation as being copied from
the _Devana Radical_. And the letter-thief resided at Devana; and
engaged in job-journalism: also, he had access to more than much of
the information here misused. Not to all of it though. Here and there
in the article, Hadrian's literary faculty enabled Him to perceive a
change of touch. Here and there were technical opinions and technical
modes of expression which could not have emanated from that one. Who
was responsible for these? The Pope, of all men on God's fair earth,
was qualified to recognize "the fine Roman hand"--the fine Roman hand
at least of one of His Own contemporaries at St. Andrew's College,
whom He had afflicted with a ridiculous label, a harmless jibe simply
composed of the man's own initial and surname joined together:--the
fine Roman hand of a pseudonymous editor with whom He had refused to
have dealings. Yes, and there too was the obscene touch of the female.
"Spretae injuri formae" over again!
At last, He summed up:--
Material Cause. Information, possessed (the gods knew by what means)
by the detected letter-thief and the female. Opinions, collected from
(perhaps proffered by) Spite desirous of stabbing Scorn in the back.
Formal Cause. Calumny, that is to say Slander which is False.
Efficient Cause. The pontifical treatment of the representatives of
the Liblab Fellowship now in the City.
Final Cause. (_a_) Intimidation. (_b_) Revenge.
It was as clear as day-light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account