Half Hours With Modern Scientists: Lectures and Essays — John Shaqi
Half Hours With Modern Scientists: Lectures and EssaysTyndall, John
Philosophy
Half Hours With Modern Scientists: Lectures and Essays
Tyndall, John
Science
wonderful metamorphosis into humanity. And were I to return to my own
place by sea, and undergo shipwreck, the crustacea might, and probably
would, return the compliment, and demonstrate our common nature by
turning my protoplasm into living lobster. Or, if nothing better were to
be had, I might supply my wants with mere bread, and I should find the
protoplasm of the wheat-plant to be convertible into man, with no more
trouble than that of the sheep, and with far less, I fancy, than that of
the lobster. Hence it appears to be a matter of no great moment what
animal, or what plant, I lay under contribution for protoplasm, and the
fact speaks volumes for the general identity of that substance in all
living beings. I share this catholicity of assimilation with other
animals, all of which, so far as we know, could thrive equally well on
the protoplasm of any of their fellows, or of any plant; but here the
assimilative powers of the animal world cease.
A solution of smelling-salts in water with an infinitesimal proportion
of some other saline matters, contains all the elementary bodies which
enter into the composition of protoplasm; but, as I need hardly say, a
hogshead of that fluid would not keep a hungry man from starving, nor
would it save any animal whatever from a like fate. An animal cannot
make protoplasm, but must take it ready-made from some other animal, or
some plant—the animal’s highest feat of constructive chemistry being to
convert dead protoplasm into that living matter of life which is
appropriate to itself. Therefore, in seeking for the origin of
protoplasm, we must eventually turn to the vegetable world. The fluid
containing carbonic acid, water, and ammonia, which offers such a
barmecide feast to the animal, is a table richly spread to multitudes of
plants; and with a due supply of only such materials, many a plant will
not only maintain itself in vigor, but grow and multiply until it has
increased a million-fold, or a million million-fold, the quantity of
protoplasm which it originally possessed; in this way building up the
matter of life, to an indefinite extent, from the common matter of the
universe. Thus the animal can only raise the complex substance of dead
protoplasm to the higher power, as one may say, of living protoplasm;
while the plant can raise the less complex substances—carbonic acid,
water, and ammonia—to the same stage of living protoplasm, if not to the
same level. But the plant also has its limitations. Some of the fungi,
for example, appear to need higher compounds to start with, and no known
plant can live upon the uncompounded elements of protoplasm. A plant
supplied with pure carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen, phosphorus,
sulphur, and the like, would as infallibly die as the animal in his bath
of smelling-salts, though it would be surrounded by all the constituents
of protoplasm. Nor, indeed, need the process of simplification of
vegetable food be carried so far as this, in order to arrive at the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account