“I fancy that the Greek and Latin authors wrote the wrong word now and
then, and never noticed it. That is not the view of textual critics
and editors: they ascribe all errors to the men who copied out the
manuscripts. But this limits them to errors that might arise in
copying, and thus restricts the choice of emendations far too much.
Take such an emendation as _Isara_ for _Arar_ in Livy, xxi. 31. This
makes Livy say that the river was the Isère, not the Saône; but the
context requires him to say it was the Durance, otherwise he would be
saying ‘right’ instead of ‘left’ a few lines further on. A copyist
might easily write _arar_ for _isara_, so this emendation is accepted,
although it does not suit.
“Such emendations are deceitful things. In this case they make Livy
say the Isère, and make Polybios say it also, iii. 49, though he says
something else; and then Members of the Alpine Club go saying that the
river must have been the Isère, since Livy and Polybios agree in saying
that it was. Other folk may say it does not matter what the river was;
but that is a reason for leaving the whole thing alone, not for getting
it wrong. If you take it up at all, you should not risk the sort of
snubbing that Westbury gave the herald after cross-examination--‘Go
away, you silly man: you don’t even understand your own silly
science.’”
That brought me letters from Members of the Alpine Club and from a
former President who is a champion of the Isère route. And this is my
reply.
CECIL TORR.
YONDER WREYLAND,
LUSTLEIGH,
DEVON.
POSTSCRIPT. I fear there is much repetition in the following pages, but
I have a reason for it. The same facts recur in different contexts; and
I have sometimes thought it better to re-state a fact than merely give
cross-references.
[Illustration:
_Proposed route_ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
_Alternatives_ --------
1. SIMPLON
2. GREAT SAINT BERNARD
3. LITTLE SAINT BERNARD
4. MONT CENIS
5. MONT GENÈVRE
6. COL DE LA TRAVERSETTE
7. COL D’ARGENTIÈRE]
[Illustration]
1. Polybios, of course, is far the best authority. He was born in
Hannibal’s lifetime; and he mentions (iii. 48. 12) that before he wrote
his account of Hannibal’s passage of the Alps, he went over the ground
himself to make quite sure.
2. As he writes in Greek, he gives the distances in stades--nine
stades make an English mile--and (iii. 39. 6–10) he reckons 2600
stades from Cartagena to the Ebro, 1600 from there to Ampurias, at the
Mediterranean end of the Pyrenees, 1600 from there to the crossing
(_diabasis_) of the Rhone, 1400 along the river from its crossing to
the ascent (_anabolê_) of the Alps, and 1200 across the Alps into Italy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account