15. These editors were very unwise in making Livy say “Isara,” as he
would not have mentioned the confluence of the Isère and the Rhone
without saying a good deal more. The monuments of the victory of 8
August 121 B.C. were at the confluence of the Isère and the Rhone.
Strabo mentions them (iv. 1. 11) and Livy, who was his contemporary,
must have known that they were there. (Livy described the victory in
one of his lost books, lxi, the contents of which are known from the
epitome.) Livy says (xxi. 31) that as soon as Hannibal reached the
confluence of the Saône and the Rhone, he secured the support of the
Allobriges. If this had happened at the confluence of the Isère and the
Rhone, Livy would have made a telling point of the contrast between
Hannibal’s securing the support of the Allobriges for his onslaught
on Rome, and their subjugation by the Romans at the very same place a
century later on.
16. No doubt the Saône rises in the Vosges and not in what we call the
Alps; but Strabo (iv. 1. 11) and Ptolemy (ii. 10. 3) describe it as
rising in the Alps, and Livy is probably taking the same view in saying
that it rose there. It seems unwise to argue that he must have meant
the Isère because the Isère rises in the Alps.
17. Ammianus says (xv. 11. 17) that the Arar was also known as the
Saucona, _Ararim, quem Sauconam appellant_. He quotes Timagenes by
name in xv. 9. 2, and probably quotes him here, as the pseudo-Plutarch
(DE FLUVIIS, 6) quotes him for information about the Arar, which
information (it says) he copied from Callisthenes. Timagenes was
a contemporary of Livy; and I suspect that when Livy was copying
Polybios, he took Scôras for Saucona or a variant of that name, but
translated it as Arar because this name was better known.
18. The editors of Polybios have also tampered with their text and
printed “Isaras” for “Scôras” in iii. 49. 6, as if the river was
clearly the Isère. They seem to have forgotten what he says in the
next sentence. As already mentioned in paragraph 12, he says that the
so-called island between the Scôras and the Rhone was of the same
shape as the Delta of the Nile, with these two rivers as the sides
and a range of mountains (instead of sea) as the base. But it is a
quadrangle, not a triangle, between the Isère and the Rhone: the Isère
on the south, the Mont du Chat on the east, and the Rhone on the north
as well as on the west, as its course turns round a right-angle at
Lyons. When Polybios wanted to say that a place was quadrangular, he
said so--he says _tetragônos topos_ in vi. 27. 2--and he would have
said so here, if that had been his meaning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account