Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 1 (of 2)Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
History
Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 1 (of 2)
Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
Holbein, Hans, 1497-1543 -- Criticism and interpretation; Painters -- Germany -- Biography
The drawing illustrating the phrase, “the golden collar of princes,” is
an unmistakable portrait of the Emperor Maximilian. A portrait, much
less easily recognised, is that of the writer of the book. In one
passage Erasmus has mentioned his own name, and opposite to it Holbein
drew the philosopher seated at a desk in his study, in scholar’s cap and
gown, engaged in writing the _Adagia._ Through an arched opening is seen
a view of mountain and lake (Pl. 13 (6)). To make certain that there
should be no doubt as to whom the portrait represented, Holbein has
written the name “Erasmus” at the top of the arch. Molitor, in a
marginal note, states that when Erasmus came to this drawing, in which
he is depicted as a comparatively youthful man, he exclaimed, “Ohé! Ohé!
if Erasmus still looked like this, he would certainly take a wife.” The
name “Holbein” occurs over one of the other sketches, which represents a
fat and coarse-looking carouser seated at table, draining a bottle of
wine, and at the same time fondling a woman seated by him, and
illustrating the passage from Horace which refers to “a fat and splendid
pig from the herd of Epicurus” (Pl. 13 (7)). This is said to have been
written by the sage himself in playful revenge for the introduction of
his own portrait among the foolish of mankind.[120]
This somewhat primitive jest appears to be the sole foundation for the
statements of several of Holbein’s earlier biographers that he was of a
gross and sensual character, too fond of the wine-cup, and, in
consequence, lived in poverty. The worst offender in this way was
Charles Patin, a French physician who had settled in Basel in the
seventeenth century, after having been forced to leave Paris on account
of some misbehaviour. He was the first to bring this accusation against
the painter, and later writers copied him without verifying his
statements. Van Mander and Sandrart, who repeated all the gossip they
could collect, do not allude to this supposed weakness in the painter’s
character. Patin’s misrepresentations occur in a short life of Holbein,
filled with inaccuracies, which he wrote as a preface to an edition of
the _Praise of Folly_, issued in Basel in 1676, in which, for the first
time, these marginal illustrations were published, being engraved for
the book by C. Merian from copies of the originals made by W. Stettler.
They at once became highly popular, and various editions followed, both
on the Continent and in England. Patin evidently allowed his imagination
to run away with him in his interpretation of this somewhat feeble joke
made at Holbein’s expense. There is absolutely no foundation for the
legend thus set going; the painter’s whole career, the high perfection
of his technical powers, and the extraordinary amount of work he
accomplished in his short life are more than sufficient in themselves to
refute it.
VOL. I., PLATE 13.
[Illustration:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account