Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
History
Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)
Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
Holbein, Hans, 1497-1543 -- Criticism and interpretation; Painters -- Germany -- Biography
Footnote 406:
The first of these was due to him, and not covered by the year’s
advance.
[Sidenote: HIS WORK ABOUT THE COURT]
In September 1540 he received an advance of half a year: “September, A^o
xxxii—Item paide to Hans Holbyn, the Kingis paynter, in advauncement of
his wagis for one half yere beforehande, the same half yere accompted
and reconned fromme Michaelmas last paste, the somme of xv _li._” This
time, however, he did not receive his salary twice over, for in the two
following entries, at Michaelmas and Christmas, 1540, the accounts
merely state: “Item, for Hans Holbyn, paynter, wages, nihil, quia prius
per warrantum.” In the following March 1541 he again obtained a
half-year’s advance: “March, A^o xxxii: Item paied to Hans Holben, the
Kingis painter, in advauncement of his half yeres wages before hande,
after the rate of xxx _li._ by yere, which half yere is accompted to
beginne primo Aprilis A^o xxxij. domini Regis nunc, and shall ende
ultimo Septembris then next ensuynge, the somme of xv _li._” The two
remaining entries of which we have record, at Lady Day and Midsummer
following, are as follows: “Item for Hans Holben, paynter, wages, nil,
quia praemanibus”; and “Item for Hans Holbyn, paynter, nihil, quia
prius.” The volume of accounts closes with the payments for this
quarter, and no details of the royal expenditure during the next two
years and a half exist, so that there is no record of the salary Holbein
received for the remaining years of his life. In a later volume of
Tuke’s accounts, as treasurer of the household, extending from October,
35 Hen. VIII (1543) to November, 36 Hen. VIII (1544), the first
quarterly payments are for Christmas 1543, and Holbein’s name does not
occur in them, as he had then been dead for about two months. It is
rather strange, however, that it does not appear among the Christmas
payments with “Nihil quia mortuus” after it, as this was the usual
procedure in case of death. This omission, however, may have been due to
the fact that he had once again received his salary beforehand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account