Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
History
Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)
Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
Holbein, Hans, 1497-1543 -- Criticism and interpretation; Painters -- Germany -- Biography
Woltmann, 269. Reproduced by Law, Pl. vii.; Knackfuss, fig. 135;
Williamson, Pl. ii. fig. 7; Ganz, _Holbein_, p. 149 (1).
[Sidenote: HENRY AND CHARLES BRANDON]
The boys were the sons of Charles Brandon, first Duke of Suffolk, who
became brother-in-law of the King by his secret marriage in Paris on May
13, 1515, with the young Queen Dowager of France, widow of Louis XII;
and their mother, Suffolk’s fourth wife, was Catherine, only daughter
and heiress of William, tenth Lord Willoughby de Eresby. The year date
on the elder boy’s portrait has been usually read as 1535. It is so
given by Wornum and Woltmann, and other writers have followed them, but
if the portrait represents Henry Brandon, the date is quite impossible.
Mary Tudor, the “French Queen,” the Duke of Suffolk’s third wife, died
on June 25, 1533, and in September of the same year Brandon married
Catherine Willoughby, the mother of these two boys. In Burke, on the
other hand, it is stated that the marriage took place in 1535; but this
appears to be incorrect. The _Dictionary of National Biography_ gives
the date of the elder boy’s birth as September 18, 1535, which date is
fixed by the _inquisitio post mortem_ held after his father’s death in
1545; so that it is quite impossible that the lad could have been five
years old in 1535. Mr. Ernest Law reads the date on the miniature as
possibly 1539; to the writer, however, who has not had the privilege of
examining the original, it appears, from careful examination of the
excellent reproduction in Mr. Law’s book, to be either 1543 or 1545, the
third figure being plainly a 4. Neither of these dates, however, can be
correct, and it is quite possible that at some time the inscription,
growing illegible, has been repainted, and that in so doing the restorer
has made a mistake. The lettering on both miniatures lacks the precision
of an original inscription by Holbein. It is generally assumed that the
two dates, “6 Sep” and “10 Marci,” refer to the boys’ birthdays, and
there is no difficulty with regard to the second boy, Charles, who was
born in March 1538, two and a half years after his brother. The two
miniatures have every appearance of having been painted at about the
same time, and it is to be expected that the elder of the two would be
painted first. The writer suggests, therefore, that the correct date of
the portrait of Henry is September 1540, and that of Charles, March
1541.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account