very great, popular, and influential men of letters considered the
dissertation which he was preparing utterly flat, insipid, and
unnecessary; that the painful apostleship of criticism with which they
were charged in various public pages, imposing upon them the mournful
duty of pitilessly hunting down the monster of “romanticism” and bad
taste, they were even then busily preparing for certain enlightened and
impartial journals a conscientious, analytical, and spicy criticism of
the aforesaid forthcoming dissertation. Upon hearing this terrible news,
the poor author _obstupuit; steteruntque comæ, et vox faucibus
hæsit_,--that is to say, nothing remained but to leave in the limbo
whence he was about to rescue it the essay, “virgin and yet unborn,” as
Jean Jacques Rousseau has it, of which such just and such severe critics
had fallen foul. His friend advised him to replace it by a few simple
preliminary remarks from the publishers, as he could very properly put
into those gentlemen’s mouths all the sweet nothings which so delicately
tickle an author’s ear; nay, he even offered him certain models, taken
from highly successful works, some beginning with the words, “The
immense popular success of this book,” etc.; others thus, “The European
fame which this work has won,” etc.; or, “It is now superfluous to
praise this book, since popular opinion declares that no praise can
equal its merit,” etc. Although these various formulæ, according to the
discreet adviser, were not without their attested virtues, the author
did not feel sufficient humility and paternal indifference to expose his
work to the disappointment or the demands of the reader who should
peruse these magnificent apologies, nor sufficient effrontery to imitate
those rustic mountebanks who attract the curious public by displaying a
painted crocodile upon a curtain, behind which, on paying their fee,
they find nothing but a lizard. He therefore rejected the idea of
sounding his own praises through the obliging lips of his publishers.
His friend then suggested that he should put into the mouth of his
villanous Icelandic outlaw, by way of a passport, phrases suited to
popularize him and render him congenial with the age,--such as delicate
jests directed against the nobility, bitter sarcasms upon the clergy,
ingenious invectives against nuns, monks, and other monsters of the
social order. The author asked nothing better; but it scarcely seemed to
him that nobles and monks had any very direct connection with the work
in hand. He might, it is true, have borrowed other colors from the same
palette, and thrown together a few highly philanthropic pages, in
which--always keeping at a prudent distance from the dangerous shoals
hidden under the waters of philosophy, and known as the shoals of the
Court of Misdemeanors--he might have advanced certain of those truths
discovered by the wise for the glory of mankind and the consolation of
the dying; namely, that man is but a brute, that the soul is a gas of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account