Hardtack and coffee : $b or, the unwritten story of Army life, including chapters on enlisting, life in tents and log huts, jonahs and beats, offences and punishments, raw recruits, foraging, corps and corps badges, the wagon trains, the Army mule, the Engineer Corps, the Signal Corps, etc. — John Shaqi
Hardtack and coffee : $b or, the unwritten story of Army life, including chapters on enlisting, life in tents and log huts, jonahs and beats, offences and punishments, raw recruits, foraging, corps and corps badges, the wagon trains, the Army mule, the Engineer Corps, the Signal Corps, etc.Billings, John Davis
History
Hardtack and coffee : $b or, the unwritten story of Army life, including chapters on enlisting, life in tents and log huts, jonahs and beats, offences and punishments, raw recruits, foraging, corps and corps badges, the wagon trains, the Army mule, the Engineer Corps, the Signal Corps, etc.
Billings, John Davis
Billings, John Davis, 1842-1933; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Personal narratives; United States. Army -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865; United States. Army -- Military life -- History -- 19th century
All of this is preliminary to saying that while there was in Army
Regulations this prescribed plan for laying out camps, yet the soldiers
were more distinguished for their breach than their observance of this
plan. Army Regulations were adopted for the guidance of the regular
standing army; but this same regular army was now only a very small
fraction of the Union forces, the largest portion by far—“the biggest
half,” to use a Hibernianism—were volunteers, who could not or would
not all be bound by Army Regulations. In the establishing of camps,
therefore, there was much of the go-as-you-please order of procedure. It
is true that regiments commanded by strict disciplinarians were likely
to and did keep pretty close to regulations. Many others approximated
this standard, but still there then remained a large residuum who suited
themselves, or, rather, perhaps did not attempt to suit anybody unless
compelled to by superior authority; so that in entering some camps one
might find everything betokening the supervision of a critical military
spirit, while others were such a hurly-burly lack of plan that a mere
plough-jogger might have been, and perhaps was, the controlling genius of
the camp. When troops located in the woods, as they always did for their
winter cantonments, this lack of system in the arrangement was likely to
be deviated from on account of trees. But to the promised topic of the
chapter.
Come with me into one of the log huts. I have already spoken of its
walls, its roof, its chimney, its fire-place. The door we are to enter
may be cut in the same end with the fire-place. Such was often the case,
as there was just about unoccupied space enough for that purpose. But
where four or more soldiers located together it was oftener put in the
centre of one side. In that case the fire-place was in the opposite side
as a rule. In entering a door at the end one would usually observe two
bunks across the opposite end, one near the ground (or floor, when there
was such a luxury, which was rarely), and the other well up towards the
top of the walls. I say, _usually_. It depended upon circumstances. When
two men only occupied the hut there was one bunk. Sometimes when four
occupied it there was but one, and that one running lengthwise. There are
other exceptions which I need not mention; but the average hut contained
two bunks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account