Building -- Estimates; Factories -- Design and construction; Hardware
=34.= Within the last few years, the cost of the best Portland cement
has been so materially reduced that concrete has become an available
material for the construction of factories. Unless used in great
masses, however, it has not the strength to support the necessary
floor loads without the use of steel reinforcement. As explained in
_Design of Beams_, the fibers on the bottom of all beams subjected to
transverse stress are in tension, and while concrete has considerable
resistance to compression, it offers comparatively little to tensile
stress. It is therefore necessary to reinforce the lower portion of all
beams and floor slabs as indicated at _a_, Fig. 16.
=35. Advantages of Reinforced Concrete.=—In Fig. 16, the details of
a typical reinforced-concrete factory building are illustrated, and
a building of this character may be constructed for a cost of from
10 to 15 per cent. greater than the ordinary slow-burning type of
building. Besides, this construction possesses the advantage of being
practicable for long spans and heavy loads, whereas in buildings of
the slow-burning type, owing to the fact that the size of the wooden
beams is limited to the available commercial timber, it is frequently
impossible to design floors with girders of large spans for floor
loads of over 250 pounds per square foot. While this is a heavy load,
it is too light for some classes of work, such as occur in printing
houses and lithographing establishments where heavy stones are used and
stored. The floor loads in such buildings sometimes amount to as much
as 300 or 400 pounds per square foot, while it is not unusual to find
the load on floors in warehouses amounting to as much as 500 pounds per
square foot.
[Illustration: FIG. 17]
=36. Strength of Concrete Columns With Steel Cores.=—In the building
shown in Fig. 17, it will be noticed that the columns are reduced
in size in the lower floors, increased in the middle portion of the
building, and reduced toward the roof. The reduction in the columns
_a_ and _b_ is due to the fact that these columns are reinforced with
a steel core composed of structural shapes riveted together, angles
usually being employed for this purpose. In proportioning such columns,
it is good practice to figure on the ultimate safe unit compressive
stress of the steel without considering the reduction made by the usual
column formula, but to neglect, in the consideration of the strength
of the column, the resistance of the concrete surrounding the steel
core. To illustrate, if the sectional area of the steel reinforcements
in these columns equals 20 square inches, and a safe unit fiber stress
of 16,000 pounds is assumed, the safe strength of the column will be
320,000 pounds.
Above the second floor, the columns are made much larger, for here
there is less steel reinforcement, and it is necessary to figure on the
safe bearing strength of the concrete.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account