Building -- Estimates; Factories -- Design and construction; Hardware
136 | | | | | | | | |3,868|4,178|4,466| 121| 94.85|100.88
142 | | | | | | | | |4,305|4,567|4,886| 126|103.69|109.98
150 | | | | | | | | |4,719|5,097|5,448| 133|115.72|122.72
=====+===+===+===+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+======+======
Considering the first requirement, a circular flue is considered more
efficient than a square one, because its inside surface offers less
resistance to the passage of the gases, and there is not the likelihood
of eddies being formed. There is much difference of opinion among
engineers as to whether a stack should be narrower toward the top or
increased in size. The practice is to taper a stack toward the top,
this being done more on account of the necessity for increasing its
stability than because of the draft. Some stacks have been built,
however, with a larger inside diameter at the top than at the bottom,
with the idea of providing a greater sectional area for the passage of
the gases as their velocity is decreased. The capacity of the stack
for carrying off the products of combustion depends on the temperature
of the inside gases as compared with the temperature of the outside
air. The average temperature in stacks for power purposes ranges from
450° to 600° F., and, therefore, as there is little difference in the
travel of gases in flues between these temperatures, Table I can safely
be used in determining the diameter and height of stack for a given
capacity of power plant.
In Table I, it will be observed that the capacity of the stack is given
in horsepower, and in calculating this table it was considered that
5 pounds of coal were burned to develop 1 horsepower, this being a
high figure with the present economical systems of power generation.
Allowance has also been made, in this table, for the friction of the
gases against the side walls of the stack, it being considered that a
2-inch layer of dead air exists between the stack lining and the gases.
[Illustration: FIG. 31]
=65. Stability of Brick Chimneys.=—In considering the stability of
brick stacks, the overturning moment due to the wind must not exceed
the resisting moment of the stack to overturning about the base. For
instance, referring to Fig. 31, the pressure _p_ due to the wind acts
with the lever arm _x_ about the base of the stack, tending to overturn
it. The stack, or chimney, resists this overturning moment with its
weight _w_, acting through a lever arm _y_; if these two moments
are equal, the stack can be considered safe under the conditions
considered, though it is better to have some factor of safety, 2
usually being sufficient. An easy formula by which to determine whether
a stack is stable or not, is as follows:
_h_² × _dc_
_w_ = ------------
b
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account