Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. IX.—February, 1851.—Vol. II.Various
General
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. IX.—February, 1851.—Vol. II.
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
Several theories have been hazarded in explanation of the mystery; but
none of them are satisfactory. Euler attempted to account for it on the
principle of percussion; but if it were produced by percussion the
fracture would necessarily be instantaneous. The best solution that can
be offered, although it is by no means free from difficulties, refers
the cause of the disruption to electricity. There is no doubt that
glass, which has been suddenly cooled, is more electric than glass that
has been carefully annealed--a process which we will presently explain;
and such glass has been known to crack and shiver from a change of
temperament, or from the slightest scratch. The reason is obvious
enough. When glass is suddenly cooled from the hands of the artificer,
the particles on the outer side are rapidly contracted, while those on
the inner side, not being equally exposed to the influence of the
atmosphere, yet remain in a state of expansion. The consequence is that
the two portions are established on conflicting relations with each
other, and a strain is kept up between them which would not exist if the
whole mass had undergone a gradual and equal contraction, so that when a
force is applied which sets in motion the electric fluid glass is known
to contain, the motion goes on propagating itself till it accumulates a
power which the irregular cohesion of the particles is too weak to
resist. This action of the electric fluid will be better understood from
an experiment which was exhibited before the Royal Society upon glass
vessels with very thick bottoms, which, being slightly rubbed with the
finger, broke after an interval of half an hour.[7] The action of the
electric fluid in this instance is sufficiently clear; but why the
contact with fragments of certain bodies should produce the same result,
or why that result is not produced by contact with other bodies of even
greater size and specific gravity, is by no means obvious.
[Footnote 7: Lard. Cyclo.]
Among the strangest phenomena observed in glass are those which are
peculiar to tubes. A glass tube placed in a horizontal position before
a fire, with its extremities supported, will acquire a rotatory motion
round its axis, moving at the same time _toward_ the fire,
notwithstanding that the supports on which it rests may form an inclined
plane the contrary way. If it be placed on a glass plane--such as a
piece of window-glass--it will move _from_ the fire, although the plane
may incline in the opposite direction. If it be placed standing nearly
upright, leaning to the right hand, it will move from east to west; if
leaning to the left hand, it will move from west to east; and if it be
placed perfectly upright, it will not move at all. The causes of these
phenomena are unknown, although there has been no lack of hypotheses in
explanation of them.[8]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account