Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. VVarious
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. V
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
"Tush! tush!" interrupted Dutton; "the fellow has no wits to lose.
That being so--But let us talk of something else." We did so, but
on his part very incoherently, and I soon bade him good-night.
This was December, and it was in February the following year that
Dutton again called at our place of business. There was a strange,
stern, iron meaning in his face. "I am in a great hurry," he said,
"and I have only called to say, that I shall be glad if you will run
over to the farm to-morrow on a matter of business. You have seen,
perhaps, in the paper, that my dwelling-house took fire the night
before last. You have not? Well, it is upon that I would consult
you. Will you come?" I agreed to do so, and he withdrew.
The fire had not, I found, done much injury. It had commenced in a
kind of miscellaneous store-room; but the origin of the fire
appeared to me, as it did to the police-officers that had been
summoned, perfectly unaccountable. "Had it not been discovered in
time, and extinguished," I observed to Mrs. Rivers, "you would all
have been burned in your beds."
"Why, no," replied that lady, with some strangeness of manner. "On
the night of the fire, Annie and I slept at Mr. Elsworthy's" (I have
omitted to notice, that my brother-in-law and family had returned to
their old residence), "and Mr. Dutton remained in London, whither he
had gone to see the play."
"But the servants might have perished?"
"No. A whim, apparently, has lately seized Mr. Dutton, that no
servant or laborer shall sleep under the same roof with himself; and
those new outhouses, where their bedrooms are placed, are, you see,
completely detached, and are indeed, as regards this dwelling, made
fire-proof."
At this moment Mr. Dutton appeared, and interrupted our
conversation. He took me aside. "Well," he said, "to what conclusion
have you come? The work of an incendiary, is it not? Somebody too,
that knows I am not insured--"
"Not insured!"
"No; not for this dwelling-house. I did not renew the policy some
months ago."
"Then," I jestingly remarked, "you, at all events, are safe from any
accusation of having set fire to your premises with the intent to
defraud the insurers."
"To be sure--to be sure, I am," he rejoined with quick earnestness,
as if taking my remark seriously. "That is quite certain. Some one,
I am pretty sure, it must be," he presently added, "that owes me a
grudge--with whom I have quarreled, eh?"
"It may be so, certainly."
"It _must_ be so. And what, Mr. Sharp, is the highest penalty for
the crime of incendiarism?"
"By the recent change in the law, transportation only; unless,
indeed, loss of human life occur in consequence of the felonious
act; in which case, the English law construes the offense to be
willful murder, although the incendiary may not have intended the
death or injury of any person."
"I see. But here there could have been no loss of life."
"There might have been, had not you, Mrs. Rivers, and Annie, chanced
to sleep out of the house."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account