Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. VVarious
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. V
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
"True--true--a diabolical villain, no doubt. But we'll ferret him
out yet. You are a keen hand, Mr. Sharp, and will assist, I know.
Yes, yes--it's some fellow that hates me--that I perhaps hate and
loathe--" he added with sudden gnashing fierceness, and striking his
hand with furious violence on the table--"as I do a spotted toad!"
I hardly recognized James Dutton in this fitful, disjointed talk,
and as there was really nothing to be done or to be inquired into, I
soon went away.
"Only one week's interval," I hastily remarked to Mr. Flint, one
morning after glancing at the newspaper, "and another fire at
Dutton's farm-house!"
"The deuce! He is in the luck of it, apparently," replied Flint,
without looking up from his employment. My partner knew Dutton only
by sight.
The following morning, I received a note from Mrs. Rivers. She
wished to see me immediately on a matter of great importance. I
hastened to Mr. Dutton's, and found, on arriving there, that George
Hamblin was in custody, and undergoing an examination, at no great
distance off, before two county magistrates, on the charge of having
fired Mr. Dutton's premises. The chief evidence was, that Hamblin
had been seen lurking about the place just before the flames broke
out, and that near the window where an incendiary might have entered
there were found portions of several lucifer matches, of a
particular make, and corresponding to a number found in Hamblin's
bedroom. To this Hamblin replied, that he had come to the house by
Mr. Dutton's invitation, but found nobody there. This however, was
vehemently denied by Mr. Dutton. He had made no appointment with
Hamblin to meet at his (Dutton's) house. How should he, purposing as
he did to be in London at the time? With respect to the lucifer
matches, Hamblin said he had purchased them of a mendicant, and that
Mr. Dutton saw him do so. This also was denied. It was further
proved, that Hamblin, when in drink, had often said he would ruin
Dutton before he died. Finally, the magistrates, though with some
hesitation, decided that there was hardly sufficient evidence to
warrant them in committing the prisoner for trial, and he was
discharged, much to the rage and indignation of the prosecutor.
Subsequently, Mrs. Rivers and I had a long private conference. She
and the child had again slept at Elsworthy's on the night of the
fire, and Dutton in London. "His excuse is," said Mrs. Rivers, "that
he can not permit us to sleep here unprotected by his presence." We
both arrived at the same conclusion, and at last agreed upon what
should be done--attempted rather--and that without delay.
Just before taking leave of Mr. Dutton, who was in an exceedingly
excited state, I said: "By-the-by, Dutton, you have promised to dine
with me on some early day. Let it be next Tuesday. I shall have one
or two bachelor friends, and we can give you a shake-down for the
night."
"Next Tuesday?" said he quickly. "At what hour do you dine?"
"At six. Not a half-moment later."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account