Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. VVarious
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. V
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
It is equally true that the most tender emotions find no
fitting-place upon the stage. The deepest pathetic--the purest, the
most soul-healing--in other words, the pathetic of common life, can
not be _acted_ without revolting us. Hence, to fit it for the stage,
pity must be mingled with other ingredients of a more exciting or
spicy kind. It must be associated with the extravagance of love, or
stinging jealousy, or complaining madness, or some other less usual
semi-malevolent passion, which, while it adds to the theatrical
effect, actually deadens the more genial and deeper sympathies that
are demanded for the undramatic or ordinary sufferings of humanity.
We can not illustrate this thought better than by referring the
reader to that most touching story which is given in the July number
of our Magazine, and entitled, "The Mourner and the Comforter." How
rich the effect of such a tale when simply read, without any
external accompaniments!--how much richer, we might say, for the
very want of them! How its "rain of tears" mellows and fertilizes
the hard soil of the human heart! And yet how few and simple the
incidents! How undramatic the outward fictitious dress, through
which are represented emotions the most vitally real in human
nature! Like a strain of the richest, yet simplest music, in which
the accompaniment is just sufficient to call out the harmonious
relations of the melody, without marring by its artistic or dramatic
prominence the deep spiritual reality that dwells in the tones. We
appeal to every one who has read that touching narrative--how
utterly would it be spoiled by being _acted_! There might be some
theatrical effect given to the agitated scene upon the balcony, but
a vail would have to be drawn around the chamber of the mourner, and
the more than heroic friend who sits by her in the long watches of
the night. Such scenes, it may be said, are too common for the
stage--ay, and too holy for it, too. They are too pure for the
Kembles and Sinclairs ever to meddle with, and they know it, and
their audiences feel it. We decide instinctively that all _acting_
here would be more than out of place. The very thought of theatrical
representation would seem like a profanation of the purest and
holiest affections of our nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account