Harper's New Monthly Magazine Vol. IV, No. 19, Dec 1851Various
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine Vol. IV, No. 19, Dec 1851
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
A superstitious reverence for a bilious condition of body, and an
abhorrence of soap and water, as savoring of idolatry or of
luxury--according to the dress and nation of the Cynic--made up the
fundamental ideas of his school; and to this day they are the cabala of
one division of the sect. We confess not to be able to see much beauty
in either of these conditions, and are rather proud than otherwise of
our state of disbelief; holding health and cleanliness in high honor,
and hoping much of moral improvement from their better preservation. But
to the Tub School, good digestive powers, and their consequence, good
temper, were evidences of lax principles, and cleanliness was
ungodliness or effeminacy; as the unpurified denouncer prayed to St.
Giles, or sacrificed to Venus Cloacina. Take the old monks as an
example. Not that we are about to condemn the whole Catholic Church
under a cowled mask. She has valuable men among her sons; but, in such a
large body, there must of necessity be some members weaker than the
rest; and the mendicant friars, and do-nothing monks, were about the
weakest and the worst that ever appeared by the Catholic altar. They
were essentially of the Tub School, as false to the best purposes of
mankind as the famous old savage of Alexander's time. Dirt and vanity,
bile and condemnation, were the paternosters of their litany; and what
else lay in the tub which the king over-shadowed from the sun? All the
accounts of which we read, of pious horror of baths and washhouses--all
the frantic renunciation of laundresses, and the belief in hair shirts,
to the prejudice of honest linen--all the religious zeal against
small-tooth combs, and the sin which lay in razors and nail-brushes--all
the holy preference given to coarse cobbling of skins of beasts, over
civilized tailoring of seemly garments--all the superiority of bare
feet, which never knew the meaning of a pediluvium, over those which
shoes and hose kept warm, and foot-baths rendered clean--all the hatred
of madness against the refinements of life, and the cultivation of the
beautiful: these were the evidences of the Diogenic philosophy; and of
Monachism too; and of other forms of faith, which we could name in the
same breath. And how much good was in them? What natural divinity lies
in fur, which the cotton plant does not possess? Wherein consists the
holiness of mud, and the ungodliness of alkali? wherein the purity of a
matted beard, and the impiety of Metcalfe's brushes, and Mechi's magic
strop? It may be so; and we all the while may be mentally blind; and
yet, if we lived in a charnel-house, whose horrors the stony core of a
cataract concealed, we could not wish to be couched, that seeing, we
might understand the frightful conditions of which blindness kept us
ignorant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account