Harper's New Monthly Magazine Vol. IV, No. 19, Dec 1851Various
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine Vol. IV, No. 19, Dec 1851
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
From that time, TEA was a proscribed article in Boston, and opposition
to the form of oppression was strongly manifested by the unanimity with
which the pleasant beverage was discarded. Nor did the ladies of Boston
bear this honor alone, but in Salem, Newport, Norwich, New York,
Philadelphia, Annapolis, Williamsburg, Wilmington, Charleston, and
Savannah, the women sipped "the balsamic hyperion," made from the dried
leaves of the raspberry plant, and discarded "the poisonous bohea." The
newspapers of the day abound with notices of social gatherings where
foreign tea was entirely discarded.
About this time Lord North succeeded Townshend as Chancellor of the
Exchequer. He was an honest man, a statesman of good parts, and a
sincere friend to English liberty. He doubtless desired to discharge his
duty faithfully, yet in dealing with the Americans, he utterly
misunderstood their character and temper, and could not perceive the
justice of their demands. This was the minister who mismanaged the
affairs of Great Britain throughout the whole of our war for
independence, and by his pertinacity in attempts to tax the colonies,
and in opposing them in their efforts to maintain their rights, he
finally drove them to rebellion, and protracted the war until
reconciliation was out of the question.
Early in 1770, the British merchants, the most influential class in the
realm, were driven by the non-importation agreements to become the
friends of the colonists, and to join with them in petitions and
remonstrances. The London merchants suffered more from the operations of
the new Revenue Laws, than the Americans. They had early foreseen the
consequences of an attempt to tax the colonists; and when Townshend's
scheme was first proposed, they offered to pay an equivalent sum into
the Treasury, rather than risk the loss of the rapidly-increasing
American trade. Now, that anticipated loss was actual, and was bearing
heavily upon them. It also affected the national exchequer. In one year,
exports to America had decreased in amount to the value of almost four
millions of dollars; and within three years (1767 to 1770), the
government revenue from America decreased from five hundred and fifty
thousand dollars per annum, to one hundred and fifty thousand. These
facts awakened the people; these figures alarmed the government; and
early in March, Lord North asked leave to bring in a bill, in the House
of Commons, for repealing the duties upon glass, paper, and painters'
colors, but retaining the duty of three-pence upon TEA. This impost was
very small--avowedly a "pepper-corn rent," retained to save the national
honor, about which ministers prated so loudly. The friends of
America--the _true_ friends of English liberty and "national
honor"--asked for a repeal of the whole act; the stubborn king, and the
short-sighted ministry would not consent to make the concession. North's
bill became a law in April, and he fondly imagined that the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account