Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. V, No. XXIX., October, 1852Various
Religion
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. V, No. XXIX., October, 1852
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
We would confidently test the truth of these positions by an appeal
to practical experience. There is exhibited now and then, a vast deal
of sentimental philanthropy in decrying what are called the religious
abuses of the Sabbath. It proceeds generally from those who would
confine themselves to the physical or purely secular view. Great
stress is laid on mere bodily relaxation. Utter vacancy, too, of mind,
or what is worse, mere pleasure-seeking is held forth as the source
of refreshment from past labors, and of recovered strength for those
to come. The toil-worn mechanic is invited to the place of popular
amusement, or to convey himself and his family to some scene of rural
enchantment and festivity. We are pointed for appropriate examples to
the parks of London, and the boulevards of Paris. The Sabbath, they
say, is a noble institution; but then there should be great care to
guard against the perversions of Pharisaic or Puritanical bigotry. It
may be well to give a part of the day to the services of religion;
but then, the purest religion consists in admiring God's works in the
natural world; and the poor laborer who can take his wife and children
on a ride to Bloomingdale, or indulges them with a walk in the Elysian
Fields, is performing a more acceptable service than he who makes
the Sabbath a weariness by confining himself to his own dwelling, or
spending any considerable part of it within the still more gloomy walls
of some religious conventicle.
We would not impeach the motives or the philanthropy of those who talk
in this style. Doubtless they are sincere; for there is certainly
an extreme plausibility in such a view of the matter, especially as
respects that class who have no other day of relaxation. There are
parts of the picture, too, to which the sternest Sabbatarian would take
no objection, if in any way they could be practically separated from
the rest. Pure air is certainly favorable, not only to the physical,
but to the moral health. The observation of nature, to say the least,
is not opposed to devotion, although it requires some previous devotion
to make that observation what it ought to be, or to prevent its being
consistent with the most profane and godless state of the mind and
heart. Where these can be enjoyed without danger of perverted example,
or other evils, which, in respect to our crowded city population are
almost inseparable from such indulgence, he must be a bigot indeed who
would deny them to the poor, or regard them as a desecration of the
Sabbath.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account