Harper's Pictorial Library of the World War, Volume XII : $b The Great Results of the War
History
Harper's Pictorial Library of the World War, Volume XII : $b The Great Results of the War
League of Nations; Treaty of Versailles (1919 June 28); World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects; World War, 1914-1918 -- Finance
The Belgian delegation, finally becoming alarmed, insisted on formally
taking up the question with the Council of Four. The Belgian delegation,
under the leadership of Mr. Hymans, Minister of Foreign Affairs, made
two chief demands, one for the priority already mentioned, and one for
reimbursement for what the war had cost her. To this latter item there
was vigorous objection on the ground that it was inadmissible to provide
for Belgium's "costs of war" and not for those of England, France, Italy
and the other Allies. As a compromise to meet the situation, a formula
was finally proposed in a phrase to the effect that Germany was to be
obligated especially "to reimburse Belgium for all the sums borrowed by
Belgium from the Allies as a necessary consequence of the violation of
the Treaty of 1839." Inasmuch as all such sums borrowed by Belgium were
used for the prosecution of the war, this phrase was simply a euphemism
for granting to Belgium the war costs which she had demanded. But it was
finally agreed to on all hands, and the crisis was averted.
[Illustration: Copyright by Press Illustrating Service
The George Washington
It was on this ship that President and Mrs. Wilson made their two trips
across the Atlantic and back during the Peace Conference.]
THE TREATY PRESENTED TO THE GERMANS AT VERSAILLES
The Treaty in its final form was presented to the Germans at Versailles
May 7th. The Germans were hoping they would be permitted to discuss
certain phases of the Treaty in person with the Allied delegates, and in
fact repeatedly requested the opportunity. Some of us believed such
conversations might be advantageous if they were held; not between the
chiefs of the Allied states and the heads of the German delegation, but
between technical experts on both sides. Mr. Wilson favored this view,
as tending to enlighten the Germans on certain phases of the Treaty,
which from their written communications it was evident they did not
understand. We thought that some weeks of delay might possibly be
averted by sitting around the table with the Germans, distasteful as
that task might be, and holding a kind of miniature peace conference.
This suggestion, however, was strongly opposed by M. Clemenceau,
although it was favored by some of his ministers. In fact, some of the
latter, as well as many of the British, were for a time convinced that
the terms of the Treaty were such that Germany would never sign them.
Again and again Clemenceau was urged to give way on this point, but he
sturdily opposed the view and declared positively that he knew the
German character; that the only way to secure a German signature to the
Treaty was to insist upon purely formal and written communications.
Clemenceau had his way, and then began the laying of a good many wagers
as to whether the Germans would sign. This was after the original German
delegation, or at least the chiefs of it, had returned to Berlin and
declared that they would not come back again to Versailles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account