_No. of times touch was_ _No. of points touch_ _No. of_ _Not_ _was_ _Net result_ _Touch_ _Raised_ _Lowered_ _affected_ _Raised_ + _Lowered_ - + - 1 27 0 0 10.8 0 10.8 2 6 21 0 3.6 12.4 8.8 3 10 17 0 5.8 8.5 3.5 4 6 21 0 2.8 16.7 13.9 5 14 13 0 8 6.5 1.5 6 8 19 0 7.2 6.9 .3 7 16 11 0 11 6.5 4.5 8 22 5 0 13.8 3 10.8 9 7 20 0 6.3 5 1.3 10 26 1 0 23 .5 22.5 11 21 6 0 2.1 5.4 3.3 12 26 0 1 38 0 38 13 27 0 0 48.4 0 48.4 14 23 4 0 14.2 2.4 11.8 Totals 239 138 1 149.9 29.5 Grand Total, 378 Net raised, 120.4 Average raising of each active touch judgment, .31+ % of judgments of active touch lowered, 138/378 = 36+ % of judgments of active touch raised, 239/378 = 63+ % of judgments of active touch not affected, /378 = .2+ Under combination influences, the average is reduced to 4.14+ for colors, and 3.12 for tones. The next Table, V, shows the color-tone results for F. as Table IV showed them for M. F.'s average for colors (Table I) alone was 4.35, and was reduced in combination with tones by .26, or to 4.19. So, also, F.'s average for tones alone (Table III), 4.33, was reduced by .74+ to 3.59. The averages in both cases show the same general tendency to a lowering of the appreciation in both series when the series are combined, but the tones are lowered more than the colors. Table VI shows the effect of combining tones and active touches as reported by M. The effect of this combination is clear and unmistakeable. The appreciation of the tones is raised 1.71+ points; and of the active touches, .31+ points. This result is the opposite of that shown in Table IV, where colors and tones were combined. There is this agreement, however, that the appreciation of the tones is changed more than that of the other stimuli. Relatively, the appreciation of the touches changes least.