Table VII shows the effects on F. of combining tones and active
touches. The same general tendencies appear as in the case of M.; but
the changes in appreciation are not so marked. This is not easy to
explain, for F. estimated both the active touches and the tones higher
when taken alone than did M.
Table VIII shows the effect on F. of combining tones and passive
touches. The same general tendency to increased appreciation appears,
but the tones are raised more and the touches raised less than in
Table VII. This may be explained, perhaps, on the basis of increasing
appreciation with increased participation.
Tables IX and X show the effect on M. and F., respectively, of
combining colors and active touches. M. estimates both slightly higher,
while F. estimates both slightly lower. This difference cannot be
explained by the standards for each subject. From Tables I and III we
get:
_Standards._
_Colors._ _Active Touches._
M. 4.44 4.24
F. 4.35 4.55
With M. the colors go up to 4.87
With F. the colors go down to 4.22
With M. the active touches go up to 4.41
With F. the active touches go down to 4.17
Table VII. Tone-Active Touch Results. F.
_No. of times tone was_
_No. of_ _Not_ _No of points tone was_ _Net results_
_Tone_ _Raised_ _Lowered_ _affected_ _Raised_+ _Lowered_- + -
1 11 3 0 9.25 1.75 7.5
2 10 4 0 9.5 1 8.5
3 7 7 0 5.8 7.2 1.4
4 10 4 0 12 3.2 8.8
5 9 5 0 9.85 4.25 5.6
6 9 5 0 15.1 4.5 10.6
7 10 4 0 8 6.6 1.4
8 7 7 0 5.2 6.8 1.6
9 10 4 0 8 9 1
10 12 2 0 14.2 2.8 11.4
11 12 2 0 16 2.5 13.5
12 13 1 0 9.6 .8 8.8
13 13 1 0 12.2 .6 11.2
14 10 4 0 7 2.2 4.8
15 6 8 0 3 4 1
16 9 1 4 11 2 9
17 9 0 5 14 0 14
18 12 2 0 16.4 2.6 13.8
19 12 2 0 27.6 2.4 25.2
20 12 2 0 2.4 2.6 .2
21 14 0 0 4.2 0 4.2
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account