_No. of times touch was_ _No. of_ _Not_ _No. of points touch was_ _Net Result_ _Touch_ _Raised_ _Lowered_ _affected_ _Raised_ + _Lowered_ - + - 1 0 8 20 0 8 8 2 3 14 11 3 15 12 3 23 5 0 14.5 2.5 12 4 17 11 0 11.2 4.4 6.8 5 21 1 6 27 1 26 6 16 12 0 9.6 5.8 3.8 7 4 10 14 4 10 6 8 13 7 8 14 7 7 9 17 11 0 18.6 3.2 15.4 10 15 1 12 15 1 14 11 0 1 27 0 1 1 12 28 0 0 21 0 21 13 21 7 0 18.3 7.9 10.4 14 24 4 0 31.2 1.8 29.4 Totals, 202 92 98 145.8 27 Grand total, 392 Net raised, 118.8 Average raising of each passive touch judgment, .30+ % of judgments of passive touch lowered, 92/392 = 23+ % of judgments of passive touch raised, 202/392 = 51+ % of judgments of passive touch not affected, 98/392 = 25+ Evidently no dynamic explanation of this difference is possible. It has been impossible to reveal the cause of this particular difference; in all other respects, however, the subjects agree in the general tendencies revealed. There remain the combinations of colors and passive touches. These combinations are shown in Tables XI and XII. In these tables the same general tendency to estimate both higher when colors and passive touches are combined appears. M. raises the colors more than F., and F. raises the touches more than M. This is perfectly regular, as the following table shows: _Standards._ _Raised in Combination to_ _Colors._ _Passive Touches._ _Colors._ _Passive Touches._ M. 4.44 5.14 5.16 5.40 F. 4.53 4.56 4.75 4.85 The whole results are recapitulated for both M. and F. in Table XIII. TABLE XIII. RECAPITULATION _Average_ _% of judgments of_ (----) _Av. + or - influ._ F. _Standard_ _Raised_ _Lowered_ _Not affected_ _on each_ (----) 1 Colors 4.35 28 59.6 11.9 (Color) - .26+ Tones 4.33 16 77 6 (Tone) - .74+