Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3 (of 3)Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
PhilosophyPhilosophy
Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3 (of 3)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy -- History
should bear a relation to it.
This spirit is, however, in the second place really thinking spirit
likewise. Thought as such must also develop itself therein, and that
really as this form of inmost unity of spirit with itself; thought
must come to the distinction and contemplation of this content, and
pass over into this form of the purest unity of spirit with itself. At
first thought, however, reveals itself as abstract thought alone, and
it possesses as such a relation to theology and religion. The content
which is here in question, even in so far as it is historic merely and
externally accepted, must yet be religious; the unfolding of the nature
of God must be present therein. In this we have the further demand
that the thought for which the inward nature of God is, should also
set itself in relation to this content. But inasmuch as thought is at
first understanding and the metaphysic of the understanding, it will
remove from the content the rational Idea and make it so empty that only
external history remains, which is devoid of interest.
The third position arrived at is that of concrete speculative thought.
According to the standpoint which has just been given, and as religious
feeling and its form are here determined, all speculative content as
such, as well as its developments, are at first rejected. And as for the
enrichment of the Christian conceptions through the treasures of the
philosophy of the ancient world, and through the profound ideas of all
earlier oriental religions, and the like,—all this is set aside. The
content had objectivity; but this merely signified that the objective
content, without subsisting for itself, was to constitute the beginning
only, on which the mind had spiritually to build up and sanctify itself.
All the enrichment of the content whereby it became philosophic, is thus
abandoned, and what follows later simply is that the mind, as thinking,
again immerses itself in itself, in order to be concrete and rational.
What forms the basis of the Reformation is the abstract moment of a mind
being within self, of freedom, of coming to self; freedom signifies the
life of the spirit in being turned back within itself in the particular
content which appears as another; while spirit is not free if it allows
this other-being, either unassimilated or dead, to exist in it as
something foreign. In as far as spirit now goes on to knowledge, to
spiritual determinations, and as it looks around and comes forth as a
content, so far will it conduct itself therein as in its own domain,
as in its concrete world, so to speak—and it will there really assert
and possess its own. This concrete form of knowledge which, however, in
the beginning remains but dim, we have now to consider, and it forms
the third period of our treatise, into which we properly step with the
Reformation, although Bruno, Vanini and Ramus, who lived later, still
belong to the Middle Ages.
PART THREE
MODERN PHILOSOPHY
INTRODUCTION
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account