Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3 (of 3)Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
PhilosophyPhilosophy
Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3 (of 3)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy -- History
Newton was indisputably the chief contributor to the popularity of the
philosophy of Locke, or the English method of treating of Philosophy,
and more especially did he promote its application to all the physical
sciences. “Physics, beware of metaphysics,” was his maxim,[241] which
signifies, Science, beware of thought; and all the physical sciences,
even to the present day, have, following in his wake, faithfully
observed this precept, inasmuch as they have not entered upon an
investigation of their conceptions, or thought about thoughts. Physics
can, however, effect nothing without thought; it has its categories and
laws through thought alone, and without thought it does not effect any
progress. Newton was mainly instrumental in introducing to physics the
determinations respecting forces, which pertain to reflection; he raised
science to the standpoint of reflection, and set the laws of forces
in the place of the laws of phenomena. Regarding matters as he did,
Newton derived his conclusions from his experiences; and in physics and
the theory of colour-vision, he made bad observations and drew worse
conclusions. He passed from experiences to general points of view,
again made them fundamental, and from them constructed the individual;
this is how his theories are constructed. The observation of things,
the discovery of the law immanent therein, and the universal which is
found within them, has become the real point of interest. In this way,
Newton is so complete a barbarian as regards his conceptions that his
case is like that of another of his countrymen who was surprised and
rejoiced to learn that he had talked prose all his life, not having
had any idea that he was so accomplished. This Newton, like all the
Physicists, indeed, never learned; he did not know that he thought in,
and had to deal with Notions, while he imagined he was dealing with
physical facts: and he presented the extremest contrast to Boehme, who
handled sensuous things as Notions, and, by sheer force of mind, obtained
entire possession of their actuality and subjugated them. Instead of
this Newton treated Notions like sensuous things, and dealt with them
just as men deal with wood and stone. And this is even now the case. In
the beginnings of physical science we read of the power of inertia, for
instance, of the force of acceleration, of molecules, of centripetal and
centrifugal force, as of facts which definitely exist; what are really
the final results of reflection are represented as their first grounds.
If we ask for the cause of there being no advance made in such sciences,
we find that it is because men do not understand that they should
apply themselves to Notions, but make up their minds to adopt these
determinations without sense or understanding. Hence in Newton’s Optics,
for instance, there are conclusions derived from his experience which
are so untrue and devoid of understanding, that while they are set forth
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account